Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;54(3):249-254.
doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2021.11.007.

Weight Measurements in School: Setting and Student Comfort

Emily Altman  1 , Jennifer Linchey  2 , Gabriel Santamaria  2 , Hannah R Thompson  2 , Kristine A Madsen  2
Affiliations

Weight Measurements in School: Setting and Student Comfort

Emily Altman et al. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To examine how body mass index assessments are conducted in schools and whether student comfort with assessments varies by students' perceived weight status, weight satisfaction, or privacy during measurements.

Methods: In-person cross-sectional surveys with diverse fourth- to eighth-grade students (n = 11,510) in 54 California schools in 2014-2015 about their experience being weighed in the prior school year.

Results: Half of the students (49%) reported being weighed by a physical education teacher and 28% by a school nurse. Students were more comfortable being weighed by nurses than physical education teachers (P = 0.01). Only 30% of students reported privacy during measurements. Students who were unhappy with their weight (P <0.001) and those who perceived themselves as overweight (P <0.001) were less comfortable being weighed than their peers.

Conclusions and implications: Student weight dissatisfaction, higher perceived weight status, and being female were associated with discomfort with school-based weight measurements. Prioritizing school nurses to conduct weight measurements could mitigate student discomfort, and particular attention should be paid to students who are unhappy with their weight to avoid weight stigmatization.

Keywords: BMI screening; child and adolescent health; obesity; policy; schools.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ruggieri DG, Bass SB. A comprehensive review of school-based body mass index screening programs and their implications for school health: do the controversies accurately reflect the research? J Sch Health 2015;85(1):61–72. - PubMed
    1. Morrow JR Jr., Martin SB, Jackson AW. Reliability and validity of the FITNESSGRAM: quality of teacher-collected health-related fitness surveillance data. Res Q Exerc Sport 2010;81(3 Suppl):S24–30. - PubMed
    1. Stoddard SA, Kubik MY, Skay C. Is school-based height and weight screening of elementary students private and reliable? J Sch Nurs 2008;24(1):43–48. - PubMed
    1. Berkson SS, Espinola J, Corso KA, Cabral H, McGowan R, Chomitz VR. Reliability of height and weight measurements collected by physical education teachers for a school-based body mass index surveillance and screening system. J Sch Health 2013;83(1):21–27. - PubMed
    1. Thompson HR, Linchey JK, King B, Himes JH, Madsen KA. Accuracy of School Staff-Measured Height and Weight Used for Body Mass Index Screening and Reporting. The Journal of school health 2019;89(8):629–635. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types