Differences in the microbial profiles of early stage endometrial cancers between Black and White women
- PMID: 35277280
- PMCID: PMC9093563
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.02.021
Differences in the microbial profiles of early stage endometrial cancers between Black and White women
Abstract
Objective: Black women suffer a higher mortality from endometrial cancer (EC) than White women. Potential biological causes for this disparity include a higher prevalence of obesity and more lethal histologic/molecular subtypes. We hypothesize that another biological factor driving this racial disparity could be the EC microbiome.
Methods: Banked tumor specimens of postmenopausal, Black and White women undergoing hysterectomy for early stage endometrioid EC were identified. The microbiota of the tumors were characterized by bacterial 16S rRNA sequencing. The microbial component of endometrioid ECs in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were assessed for comparison.
Results: 95 early stage ECs were evaluated: 23 Black (24%) and 72 White (76%). Microbial diversity was increased (p < 0.001), and Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria and OD1 phyla abundance was higher in tumors from Black versus White women (p < 0.001). Genus level abundance of Dietzia and Geobacillus were found to be lower in tumors of obese Black versus obese White women (p < 0.001). Analysis of early stage ECs in TCGA found that microbial diversity was higher in ECs from Black versus White women (p < 0.05). When comparing ECs from obese Black versus obese White women, 5 bacteria distributions were distinct, with higher abundance of Lactobacillus acidophilus in ECs from Black women being the most striking difference. Similarly in TCGA, Dietzia and Geobacillus were more common in ECs from White women compared to Black.
Conclusion: Increased microbial diversity and the distinct microbial profiles between ECs of obese Black versus obese White women suggests that intra-tumoral bacteria may contribute to EC disparities and pathogenesis.
Keywords: Endometrial cancer; Race disparities; Uterine microbiome.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no competing financial interest for this manuscript.
Figures
References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021;71:7–33. - PubMed
-
- Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ. Overweight, Obesity, and Mortality from Cancer in a Prospectively Studied Cohort of U.S. Adults. New England Journal of Medicine. 2003;348:1625–38. - PubMed
-
- Cote ML, Ruterbusch JJ, Olson SH, Lu K, Ali-Fehmi R. The Growing Burden of Endometrial Cancer: A Major Racial Disparity Affecting Black Women. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 2015;24:1407–15. - PubMed
-
- Ko EM, Walter Paige, Clark Leslie, Jackson Amanda, Franasiak Jason, Bolac Corey, Havrilesky Laura, Secord Angeles Alvarez, Moore Dominic T., Gehrig Paola A. Bae-Jump, Victoria L. The complex triad of obesity, diabetes and race in Type I and II endometrial cancers: Prevalence and prognostic significance. Gynecologic Oncology. 2014;133. - PubMed
-
- AlHilli MM, Bae-Jump V. Diet and gut microbiome interactions in gynecologic cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;159:299–308. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
