Impact of laparoscopic liver resection on liver regeneration
- PMID: 35277763
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09155-4
Impact of laparoscopic liver resection on liver regeneration
Abstract
Background: Liver regeneration after liver resection plays an important role in preventing posthepatectomy liver failure. In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the impact of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR) on liver regeneration.
Methods: Patients who underwent curative anatomical liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocellular carcinoma, and colorectal liver metastases at our institution between January 2010 and December 2018 were included in this study. The patients were divided into the OLR and LLR groups. Preoperative liver volume (PLV), future remnant liver volume, resected liver volume (RLV), liver volume at 1 month after the surgery, and liver volume at 6 months after the surgery were calculated. The liver regeneration rate was defined as the increase in the rate of RLV, and the liver recovery rate was defined as the rate of return to the PLV.
Results: The study included 72 patients. Among them, 43 were included in the OLR group and 29 were included in the LLR group. No differences were observed in the baseline characteristics and surgical procedures between the two groups. Moreover, no significant difference was observed in the liver regeneration rate at 1 month after the surgery (OLR vs. LLR: 68.9% vs. 69.0%, p = 0.875) and at 6 months after the surgery (91.8% vs. 93.2%, p = 0.995). Furthermore, the liver recovery rates were not significantly different between the two groups at 1 month after the surgery (90.3% vs. 90.6%, p = 0.893) and at 6 months after the surgery (96.9% vs. 98.8%, p = 0.986).
Conclusion: Liver regeneration after liver resection is not affected by the type of surgical procedure and both laparoscopic and open procedures yield similar regeneration and recovery rates.
Keywords: Future remnant liver volume; Laparoscopic liver resection; Liver regeneration; Open liver resection; Preoperative liver volume; Resected liver volume.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Long-term surgical outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: A retrospective and propensity score-matched study.Asian J Surg. 2021 Jan;44(1):206-212. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.05.028. Epub 2020 Jun 9. Asian J Surg. 2021. PMID: 32532684
-
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a multi-centre propensity score-based analysis.Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):658-666. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06812-z. Epub 2019 May 15. Surg Endosc. 2020. PMID: 31093748
-
Expanding indications for laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing resection of posterosuperior liver segments in patients with colorectal metastases: comparison with open hepatectomy for immediate and long-term outcomes.Surg Endosc. 2021 Jan;35(1):96-103. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07363-z. Epub 2020 Jan 13. Surg Endosc. 2021. PMID: 31932927
-
Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a comparative study.Surg Endosc. 2003 Dec;17(12):1914-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9070-4. Epub 2003 Oct 28. Surg Endosc. 2003. PMID: 14574547 Review.
-
Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic repeat liver resection after open liver resection: a systematic review.Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2083-2092. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06754-6. Epub 2019 Mar 18. Surg Endosc. 2019. PMID: 30887184
Cited by
-
Evaluation of liver regeneration after hemi-hepatectomy by combining computed tomography and post-operative liver function.Heliyon. 2024 May 11;10(10):e30964. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30964. eCollection 2024 May 30. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38803961 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chok KS, Ng KK, Poon RT, Lo CM, Fan ST (2009) Impact of postoperative complications on long-term outcome of curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 96(1):81–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6358 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Skrzypczyk C, Truant S, Duhamel A, Langlois C, Boleslawski E, Koriche D, Hebbar M, Fourrier F, Mathurin P, Pruvot FR (2014) Relevance of the ISGLS definition of posthepatectomy liver failure in early prediction of poor outcome after liver resection: study on 680 hepatectomies. Ann Surg 260(5):865–870 - DOI
-
- Fukushima K, Fukumoto T, Kuramitsu K, Kido M, Takebe A, Tanaka M, Itoh T, Ku Y (2014) Assessment of ISGLS definition of posthepatectomy liver failure and its effect on outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 18(4):729–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2423-y - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gruttadauria S, Parikh V, Pagano D, Tuzzolino F, Cintorino D, Miraglia R, Spada M, Vizzini G, Luca A, Gridelli B (2012) Early regeneration of the remnant liver volume after right hepatectomy for living donation: a multiple regression analysis. Liver Transpl 18(8):907–913. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.23450 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Moris D, Vernadakis S, Papalampros A, Vailas M, Dimitrokallis N, Petrou A, Dimitroulis D (2016) Mechanistic insights of rapid liver regeneration after associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for stage hepatectomy. World J Gastroenterol 22(33):7613–7624. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i33.7613 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical