Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;86(7):887-892.
doi: 10.1002/jdd.12899. Epub 2022 Mar 11.

Visual interpretation of panoramic radiographs in dental students using eye-tracking technology

FelsyPremila Gnanasekaran  1 , Latha Nirmal  2 , Sujitha P  3 , Bhavyaa R  2 , Muthu Ms  2   4 , Vanessa Y Cho  5 , Nigel M King  5 , Robert P Anthonappa  5
Affiliations

Visual interpretation of panoramic radiographs in dental students using eye-tracking technology

FelsyPremila Gnanasekaran et al. J Dent Educ. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: While eye-tracking technology is a validated tool in the field of education it is still in its infancy in the field of Pediatric Dentistry. The primary aim of this study was to determine dental undergraduates' search patterns and visual fixations while viewing panoramic radiographs (PR) using an eye-tracker. The secondary aim was to decide on the potential opportunities to enhance teaching-learning strategies when studying these radiographs.

Methods: Sixty-five dental undergraduates in the final year of their dental education consented to and participated in this study. A Tobii Pro Nano screen-based eye-tracking camera was mounted to the lower edge of a laptop with five different PR uploaded onto the Tobii Studio software. Regions of Interest (ROIs) were pre-determined for the five PR. The participants (17 males and 48 females) viewed all the PR images with no time restrictions and a "think-aloud" protocol was exercised.

Results: The average view time for the PR was 245.58 ± 106.7 s. Participants spent significantly less time examining the surrounding structures (14.85 s) than the dentitions (primary: 97.58 s and permanent: 37.58 s). Males demonstrated a slightly higher view time (290.88 ± 97.7 s) than females (229.53 ± 106.05 s).

Conclusions: The results revealed that though the participants focused on the ROI, most of them failed to make the correct diagnosis. In addition, the search patterns of the participants unveiled no sequential viewing of PR. Hence the need to revise the teaching-learning strategies for the systematic interpretation of PR images in the dental curriculum is warranted.

Keywords: curriculum; education; panoramic radiograph; search pattern; visual fixation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Duchowski AT. A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002;34(4):455-70.
    1. Celine GR, Cho VVY, Kogan A, Anthonappa RP, King NM. Eye-tracking in dentistry: what do children notice in the dental operatory? Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(6):3663-8.
    1. Bal E, Harden E, Lamb D, Van Hecke AV, Denver JW, Porges SW. Emotion recognition in children with autism spectrum disorders: relations to eye gaze and autonomic state. J Autism Dev Disord. 2010;40(3):358-70.
    1. Falck-Ytter T, Bölte S, Gredebäck G. Eye tracking in early autism research. J Neurodev Disord. 2013;5(1):281.
    1. Blignaut P, Wium D. Eye-tracking data quality as affected by ethnicity and experimental design. Behav Res Methods. 2014;46(1):67-80.

LinkOut - more resources