Spinopelvic measurements of sagittal balance with deep learning: systematic review and critical evaluation
- PMID: 35278146
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07155-5
Spinopelvic measurements of sagittal balance with deep learning: systematic review and critical evaluation
Abstract
Purpose: To summarize and critically evaluate the existing studies for spinopelvic measurements of sagittal balance that are based on deep learning (DL).
Methods: Three databases (PubMed, WoS and Scopus) were queried for records using keywords related to DL and measurement of sagittal balance. After screening the resulting 529 records that were augmented with specific web search, 34 studies published between 2017 and 2022 were included in the final review, and evaluated from the perspective of the observed sagittal spinopelvic parameters, properties of spine image datasets, applied DL methodology and resulting measurement performance.
Results: Studies reported DL measurement of up to 18 different spinopelvic parameters, but the actual number depended on the image field of view. Image datasets were composed of lateral lumbar spine and whole spine X-rays, biplanar whole spine X-rays and lumbar spine magnetic resonance cross sections, and were increasing in size or enriched by augmentation techniques. Spinopelvic parameter measurement was approached either by landmark detection or structure segmentation, and U-Net was the most frequently applied DL architecture. The latest DL methods achieved excellent performance in terms of mean absolute error against reference manual measurements (~ 2° or ~ 1 mm).
Conclusion: Although the application of relatively complex DL architectures resulted in an improved measurement accuracy of sagittal spinopelvic parameters, future methods should focus on multi-institution and multi-observer analyses as well as uncertainty estimation and error handling implementations for integration into the clinical workflow. Further advances will enhance the predictive analytics of DL methods for spinopelvic parameter measurement.
Level of evidence i: Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with the consistently applied reference standard and blinding.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Predictive analytics; Sagittal balance; Spinopelvic measurements; Systematic review.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Deep Learning Automates Measurement of Spinopelvic Parameters on Lateral Lumbar Radiographs.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Jun 15;46(12):E671-E678. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003830. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021. PMID: 33273436
-
A deep learning tool for fully automated measurements of sagittal spinopelvic balance from X-ray images: performance evaluation.Eur Spine J. 2020 Sep;29(9):2295-2305. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06406-7. Epub 2020 Apr 11. Eur Spine J. 2020. PMID: 32279117
-
Using spinopelvic parameters to estimate residual lumbar lordosis assuming previous lumbosacral fusion-a study of normative values.Spine J. 2018 Mar;18(3):422-429. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.232. Epub 2017 Aug 16. Spine J. 2018. PMID: 28822824
-
Artificial intelligence automated measurements of spinopelvic parameters in adult spinal deformity-a systematic review.Spine Deform. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1007/s43390-025-01111-1. Online ahead of print. Spine Deform. 2025. PMID: 40410653 Review.
-
Spinopelvic Parameters: Lumbar Lordosis, Pelvic Incidence, Pelvic Tilt, and Sacral Slope: What Does a Spine Surgeon Need to Know to Plan a Lumbar Deformity Correction?Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018 Jul;29(3):323-329. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2018.03.003. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018. PMID: 29933800 Review.
Cited by
-
The use of deep learning in medical imaging to improve spine care: A scoping review of current literature and clinical applications.N Am Spine Soc J. 2023 Jun 19;15:100236. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100236. eCollection 2023 Sep. N Am Spine Soc J. 2023. PMID: 37599816 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial intelligence automatic measurement technology of lumbosacral radiographic parameters.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Jul 1;12:1404058. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1404058. eCollection 2024. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024. PMID: 39011157 Free PMC article.
-
AI-Driven Segmentation and Automated Analysis of the Whole Sagittal Spine from X-ray Images for Spinopelvic Parameter Evaluation.Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Oct 20;10(10):1229. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10101229. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37892959 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical benchmark dataset for AI accuracy analysis: quantifying radiographic annotation of pelvic tilt.Sci Data. 2024 Oct 22;11(1):1162. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-04003-7. Sci Data. 2024. PMID: 39438488 Free PMC article.
-
Research on a deep learning-based model for measurement of X-ray imaging parameters of atlantoaxial joint.Eur Spine J. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09075-6. Online ahead of print. Eur Spine J. 2025. PMID: 40637839
References
-
- Vrtovec T, Pernuš F, Likar B (2019) A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature. Eur Spine J 18:593–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0913-0 - DOI
-
- Vrtovec T, Pernuš F, Likar B (2019) A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of axial vertebral rotation. Eur Spine J 18:1079–1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0914-z - DOI
-
- Vrtovec T, Janssen MMA, Likar B et al (2012) A review of methods for evaluating the quantitative parameters of sagittal pelvic alignment. Spine J 12:433–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2012.02.013 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Le Huec J-C, Thompson W, Mohsinaly Y et al (2019) Sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J 28:1889–1905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06083-1 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Maillot C, Ferrero E, Fort D et al (2015) Reproducibility and repeatability of a new computerized software for sagittal spinopelvic and scoliosis curvature radiologic measurements: Keops®. Eur Spine J 24:1574–1581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3817-1 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials