Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar;22(3):183-195.
doi: 10.1007/s11910-022-01181-y. Epub 2022 Mar 12.

Gamified Neurorehabilitation Strategies for Post-stroke Motor Recovery: Challenges and Advantages

Affiliations
Review

Gamified Neurorehabilitation Strategies for Post-stroke Motor Recovery: Challenges and Advantages

Jenna Tosto-Mancuso et al. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Stroke is the leading cause of permanent motor disability in the United States (US), but there has been little progress in developing novel, effective strategies for treating post-stroke motor deficits. The past decade has seen the rapid development of many promising, gamified neurorehabilitation technologies; however, clinical adoption remains limited. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the recent literature surrounding the adoption and use of gamification in neurorehabilitation after stroke.

Recent findings: Gamification of neurorehabilitation protocols is both feasible and effective. Deployment strategies and scalability need to be addressed with more rigor. Relationship between engaged time on task and rehabilitation outcomes should be explored further as it may create benefits beyond repetitive movement. As gamification becomes a more common and feasible way of delivering exercise-based therapies, additional benefits of gamification are emerging. In spite of this, questions still exist about scalability and widespread clinical adoption.

Keywords: Neurological rehabilitation; Stroke; Stroke rehabilitation; Video games; Virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Rendering of a simple interactive game commonly integrated in robotic therapies. The goal of this game would be to hit the target (red dot) by using robot-enabled upper extremity motor control
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Example of an exergame, where wrist movements (flexion/extension, pronation/supination, radial/ulnar deviation) control an airplane’s speed and direction, moving it toward a specific target

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Aug 11];135. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Langhorne P, Sandercock P, Prasad K. Evidence-based practice for stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:308–309. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70060-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P, Choo PL, Forster A, Morris J, et al. Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. Cochrane Stroke Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2020 Aug 11]; Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD001920.pub3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crichton SL, Bray BD, McKevitt C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CDA. Patient outcomes up to 15 years after stroke: survival, disability, quality of life, cognition and mental health. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:1091–1098. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-313361. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2008 update. Circulation. 2008;117:e25–146. - PubMed