Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 May;42(5):549-556.
doi: 10.1002/pd.6131. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

Implementation of non-invasive prenatal testing within a national UK antenatal screening programme: Impact on women's choices

Affiliations
Observational Study

Implementation of non-invasive prenatal testing within a national UK antenatal screening programme: Impact on women's choices

Bethan Bowden et al. Prenat Diagn. 2022 May.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the implementation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) on pregnant women's choices in a national NHS antenatal screening programme for Down's syndrome, Edwards' syndrome and Patau's syndrome.

Method: An observational study of all pregnant women with a singleton pregnancy and higher chance (≤1:150) combined or quadruple screening result from 30 April 2018 to 25 September 2020 in Wales, UK. Pregnant women's journey through the pathway was determined including uptake of NIPT, performance of NIPT in a non-research setting and invasive procedures performed.

Results: Of the 1273 women with a higher chance initial screening, 1073 (84%) chose NIPT contingent test, 174 (14%) no further testing and 26 (2%) invasive procedure. There were 1001 (93%) low chance NIPT results; 11 (1%) failed results and 61 (6%) high chance results. Average annual incidence of 27 invasive procedures undertaken compared to 229 pre-NIPT implementation, a nearly ninefold reduction. Down's syndrome annual live birth rate remained unchanged across the implementation period.

Discussion: This study demonstrates that NIPT contingent screening was highly acceptable to women with a resulting reduction in invasive procedures performed.

Conclusion: The high uptake of NIPT in NHS antenatal screening pathway conditions should inform planning for other national screening programmes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Public Health Wales. Antenatal Screening Wales Policy, Standards and Protocols. Version 2b. Public Health Wales NHS Trust; 2019.
    1. Chitty, LS, Wright, D, Hill, M, et al. Uptake, outcomes, and costs of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing for Down’s syndrome into NHS maternity care: prospective cohort study in eight diverse maternity units. BMJ. 2016;354:i3426.
    1. Lewis C, Hill M, Silcock C, Daley R, Chitty L. Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21: a cross-sectional survey of service users’ views and likely uptake. BJOG. 2014;121(5):582-594.
    1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villus Sampling: Green-top Guideline No. 8; 2021. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg8/
    1. Lewis C, Silcock C, Chitty LS. Non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome: pregnant women's views and likely uptake. Public Health Genomics. 2013;16:223-232.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources