Concordance in RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 between samples preserved in viral and bacterial transport medium
- PMID: 35278534
- PMCID: PMC8905882
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2022.114522
Concordance in RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 between samples preserved in viral and bacterial transport medium
Abstract
Background: While the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in samples preserved in viral transport medium (VTM) by RT-PCR is a standard diagnostic method, this may preclude the study of bacterial respiratory pathogens from the same specimen. It is unclear if the use of skim milk, tryptone, glucose, and glycerin (STGG) transport media, used for study of respiratory bacteria, allows an efficient and concurrent study of SARS-CoV-2 infections.
Objectives: To determine the concordance in SARS-CoV-2 detection by real time RT-PCR between paired nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs preserved in STGG and nasal (NS) swabs preserved in VTM.
Study design: Paired samples of NP and NS swabs were collected between December 2020 and March 2021 from a prospective longitudinal cohort study of 44 households and 132 participants from a peri-urban community (Lima, Peru). NP and NS swabs were taken from all participants once and twice per week, respectively, independent of respiratory symptoms. STGG medium was used for NP samples and VTM for NS samples. Samples were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR for N, S and ORF1ab targets. We calculated the concordance in detections between sample types and compared the RT-PCR cycle thresholds (Ct).
Results: Among the 148 paired samples, we observed a high concordance in detections between NP and NS samples (agreement = 94.59%; Kappa = 0.79). Median Ct values were statistically similar between sample types for each RT-PCR target: N, S and ORF1ab (p = 0.11, p = 0.71 and p = 0.11, respectively).
Conclusions: NP swabs collected in STGG medium are reliable alternatives to nasal swabs collected in VTM for the study of SARS-CoV-2.
Keywords: Nasal swab; Nasopharyngeal swab; SARS-CoV-2.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
References
-
- Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310. - PubMed
-
- CDC, 2021. CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel. Retrieved April 29,2021, from: https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download.
-
- Fleiss JL, Levin B., Paik MC. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 3rd. ed. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley; 2003.
-
- Grijalva C.G., Griffin M.R., Edwards K.M., Johnson M., Gil A.I., Verastegui H., Lanata C.F., Williams J.V. Concordance between RT-PCR-based detection of respiratory viruses from nasal swabs collected for viral testing and nasopharyngeal swabs collected for bacterial testing. J. Clin. Virol. 2014;60(3):309–312. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2014.04.011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
