Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 12;17(1):160.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03058-9.

Efficacy of direct anterior approach combined with direct posterior approach in Pipkin IV femoral head fractures

Affiliations

Efficacy of direct anterior approach combined with direct posterior approach in Pipkin IV femoral head fractures

Bo Liu et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to explore the efficacy of direct anterior approach combined with direct posterior approach in Pipkin IV femoral head fractures.

Methods: The study enrolled 64 patients with Pipkin IV femoral head fractures who were treated at our hospital between March 2019 and April 2020. They were assigned to the control group and the study group using the random number table method with 32 patients in each group and received treatment by the direct anterior approach and treatment by the direct anterior approach combined with the direct posterior approach. The operative time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, postoperative drainage time, drainage volume, time to partial and full weight-bearing, total length of hospital stay and the levels of hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Hct) in the two groups were compared, and severity of pain and hip function at different time points postoperatively were observed, and the occurrences of complications were compared.

Results: There was no statistical difference in the operative time and intraoperative estimated blood loss between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the control group, the study group had shorter postoperative drainage time, lower drainage volume, shorter time to partial and full weight-bearing, and shorter total length of hospital stay, and the difference was statistically different (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in Hb and Hct levels between the two groups before surgery (P > 0.05). The levels of Hb and Hct in both groups at postoperative day (POD) 1 were lower than those before surgery, and the levels of Hb and Hct in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the study group had significantly less severe pain at POD 1 and 7 and 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the study group had significantly better hip function at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). All patients were followed up for 12 months, and 1 case of ectopic ossification appeared in both groups 3 months postoperatively, both Brooker grade I. No special treatment was provided as it did not interfere with the mobility of the hip and caused no apparent discomfort in the patients. In the current study, no incision infection, ischemic necrosis of the femoral head, breakage of the internal fixation device, fracture nonunion and loss of fracture reduction and other complications were reported in any patients.

Conclusion: Direct anterior approach combined with direct posterior approach in Pipkin IV femoral head fractures does not increase operative time and intraoperative estimated blood loss but can lessen severity of pain and promote functional recovery of the hip, leading to a favorable prognosis while not increasing the incidence of complications.

Keywords: Direct anterior approach; Direct posterior approach; Efficacy of application; Pipkin IV femoral head fractures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic diagram of surgical incision through the direct anterior approach. A Longitudinal incision is made caudally about 2-cm-lateral to the distal anterior superior iliac spine along the direction of the tensor fascia lata. B The tensor fascia lata is pulled laterally, and the inner fascia, the sartorius, and rectus femoris are pulled medially to fully expose the femoral neck
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic diagram of surgical incision through direct posterior approach. A A straight incision is made from the midpoint of the line drawn between the posterior border of the tip of the greater trochanter and the posterior superior iliac spine to the posterior border of the greater trochanter. B The gluteus maximus is split along the muscle fibers and pulled laterally on both sides. C The superior portion of the greater sciatic foramen is exposed, and the superior gluteal vessels and nerves are protected and stripped along the periosteum, and the bone fragment of the posterior wall of the acetabulum is exposed
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A case of 47-year-old male with traffic accident. All fractures healed well, and no loss of fracture reduction, loosening or fracture of internal fixators occurred during the follow-up

References

    1. Wang Y, Ma JX, Yin T, et al. Correlation between reduction quality of femoral neck fracture and femoral head necrosis based on biomechanics. Orthop Surg. 2019;11(2):318–324. doi: 10.1111/os.12458. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cui Q, Zhao Q, Zhao H. Analysis of the surgical outcome of Pipkin IV fracture patients. China People’s Health Med. 2016;028(011):1–3, 9.
    1. Zheng X, Liu J, Yang S, et al. Study of the application of arthroscopy combined with direct anterior approach in hip diseases. China J Repair Reconstr Surg. 2018;32(09):1167–1171. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang H, Ge J, Zhang X, et al. Analysis of efficacy of the greater trochanter osteotomy approach and the K–L posterior approach for Pipkin IV fracture. China J Repair Reconstr Surg. 2020;34(10):1258–1262. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu S, Yang X, Xia G, et al. The surgical hip dislocation approach for Pipkin IV fracture. Chin J Trauma Orthop Surg. 2016;18(008):715–719.