Modified bilateral fasciaperichondrial flap for prominent ear correction
- PMID: 35279411
- PMCID: PMC9874352
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.01.008
Modified bilateral fasciaperichondrial flap for prominent ear correction
Abstract
Objective: Various techniques have been described in the literature for prominent ear correction. These cartilage-preserving or cartilage-shaping techniques have their own advantages and disadvantages. We aim to achieve aesthetic and stable results with low complication rates using combinations of these methods. Herein, we present our results of prominent ear surgery with a modified bilateral fasciaperichondrial flap in combination with concha-mastoid and concha-scaphal sutures.
Methods: Patients whose surgeries included a modified bilateral fasciaperichondrial flap for prominent ear deformities were included in the study. Patients' demographic data, pre- and postoperative Concha-Mastoid Angle (CMA) and upper-middle Helix-Mastoid Distances (HMD), follow-up time, complications, secondary operations, and postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) results were evaluated. With a postauricular fish-mouth incision, the bilateral fasciaperichondrial flap was planned into two: proximal- and distal-based. They were then elevated from the cartilage subperichondrially on the proximal side and supraperichondrially on the distal side. Concha-scaphal sutures were used to form an antihelical rim along with concha-mastoid sutures to reduce the concha-mastoid angle. Conchal cartilage resection was done if needed. Then, the bilateral fasciaperichondrial flaps were sutured together to cover the concha-mastoid and concha-scaphal sutures.
Results: Between May 2017 and May 2021, 32 ears of 17 patients were operated on due to prominent ear deformity. No hematoma or infection was observed in any patient, and there were no instances of recurrence, suture exposure, hypertrophic scars, or keloids. The satisfaction level of all patients was 8.2 ± 0.9 points on average according to the VAS. In the anthropometric measurements, a statistically significant difference was found between preoperative and postoperative sixth month CMA and HMD values.
Conclusion: A combination of suture techniques and a modified bilateral fasciaperichondrial flap may be used in prominent ear cases, with low recurrence rates and high patient satisfaction.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: Otoplasty; Prominent ear; Surgical techniques.
Copyright © 2022 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Two-Flap Otoplasty: A New Technique for Protruding Ear Correction.Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Jul;83(1):7-14. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001866. Ann Plast Surg. 2019. PMID: 31135506
-
Preventing Suture Extrusion and Recurrence in Mustarde and Furnas Otoplasties by Using Laterally Based Postauricular Dermal Flap, Long-Term Results.J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Sep;27(6):1476-80. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002832. J Craniofac Surg. 2016. PMID: 27607117
-
Efficacy of Using Perichondrioadipodermal Flap With Combined Techniques in Prominent Ear Correction.J Craniofac Surg. 2022 Jul-Aug 01;33(5):1458-1461. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008335. Epub 2021 Oct 27. J Craniofac Surg. 2022. PMID: 36041141
-
Reducing Surgical Risks for Otoplasty.Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2023 May;31(2):253-261. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2023.01.011. Epub 2023 Feb 26. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2023. PMID: 37001928 Review.
-
Prominent Ear Correction: A Comprehensive Review of Fascial Flaps in Otoplasty.Aesthet Surg J. 2018 Jun 13;38(7):695-704. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx254. Aesthet Surg J. 2018. PMID: 29490006 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative Analysis of Mustardé, Fascioperichondrial Flap, and Combined Otoplasty Techniques: Clinical Outcomes and Recurrence Rates in 365 Patients.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 3;13(11):1325. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13111325. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40508946 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Park C., Roh T.S. Anatomy and embryology of the external ear and their clinical correlation. Clin Plast Surg. 2002;29 155-v. - PubMed
-
- Ahmed M., Alkhalaf H., Ibrahim E. Helix free otoplasty for correction of prominent ear. Asian J Surg. 2019;42:621–627. - PubMed
-
- Kajosaari L., Pennanen J., Klockars T. Otoplasty for prominent ears - demographics and surgical timing in different populations. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;100:52–56. - PubMed
-
- Toplu G., Altinel D. Prominent ear repair surgery: long-term results. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32:1029–1032. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials