Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;10(4):197.
doi: 10.21037/atm-22-220.

An animal experiment study on the application of indocyanine green angiography in the harvest of multi-angiosome perforator flap

Affiliations

An animal experiment study on the application of indocyanine green angiography in the harvest of multi-angiosome perforator flap

Chaojie Wanyan et al. Ann Transl Med. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Background: This study sought to explore the application value of indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) in the harvest of multi-angiosome perforator flap and the effect of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) on the survival of postoperative flap.

Methods: Twenty-four SD male rats were selected to construct a three-angiosome perforator flap model with the unilateral iliolumbar artery perforator. They were randomly divided into two groups: the control group was injected with indocyanine green (ICG) into the femoral vein during the operation, and the fluorescence signal was collected and quantitatively analyzed using Real-Time Image Guided System to determine the intraoperative fluorescence imaging length. The experimental group was injected subcutaneously with LMWH (400 U/kg) after 0.5 h postoperatively, and the control group was injected with the same amount of normal saline. The injection was repeated at the same time each day from 0 to 7 days postoperatively. After the flap was sutured in situ, ICGA was performed at 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 days postoperatively to observe the vascular structure of the two groups of flaps. The flap survival length of the control group was counted at 7 days postoperatively, and the correlation between the intraoperative fluorescence imaging length and the survival length at 7 days postoperatively was calculated. The proportion of distal necrosis of the flaps between the two groups was compared at 7 days postoperatively.

Results: The average length of intraoperative fluorescence imaging in the control group was 6.29±0.50 cm, and the survival length of the flap at 7 days postoperatively was 8.24±0.52 cm. The actual survival length was higher than the intraoperative fluorescence imaging length, with a ratio of 1.31±0.08. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). At 7 days postoperatively, the flap necrosis ratio of experimental group and control group were 10.92%±1.30% and 19.11%±1.19%, and the flap necrosis ratio of experimental group was lower than that of control group (P<0.001).

Conclusions: ICGA can locate the position of perforator, and can be used to predict and observe the length of distal survival of multi-angiosome perforator flap postoperatively. LMWH can promote the distal survival of flap and reduce flap necrosis.

Keywords: Indocyanine green angiography; angiosome; limit length; low molecular weight heparin; perforator flap.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-22-220/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Method for measuring intraoperative fluorescence imaging length.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flap design and the harvest of the 3-angiosome perforator flap. (A) The location of the perforator; (B) flap design; (C) three perforators upon flap elevation (arrow); (D) flap harvest based on the iliolumbar perforator (arrow).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intraoperative flap fluorescence imaging. (A) Merged mode; (B) fluorescence mode.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Gross observation of flaps at postoperative day 7. (A) Gross observation of a flap in the experimental group; (B) gross observation of a flap in the control group.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of flap necrosis between the 2 groups. ***P<0.001.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Linear fitting analysis of the survival length of the flap at postoperative day 7 and the length of intraoperative fluorescence imaging.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Analysis of blood supply of the flap postoperatively. (A) Analysis of blood circulation after flap surgery in the experimental group; (B) analysis of blood circulation after flap surgery in the control group.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sinna R, Boloorchi A, Mahajan AL, et al. What should define a "perforator flap"? Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:2258-63. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f61824 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koshima I, Soeda S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg 1989;42:645-8. 10.1016/0007-1226(89)90075-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim JT, Kim SW. Perforator Flap versus Conventional Flap. J Korean Med Sci 2015;30:514-22. 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.5.514 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang W, Li X, Li X. A systematic review and meta-analysis of perforator flaps in plantar defects: Risk analysis of complications. Int Wound J 2021;18:525-35. 10.1111/iwj.13552 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O'Brien AL, Jadallah E, Chao AH. Reconstruction of a radical total vulvectomy defect with a single split anterolateral thigh perforator flap: A case report and review of the literature. Microsurgery 2021;41:70-4. 10.1002/micr.30592 - DOI - PubMed