Effects of Ultra-Long-Acting Insulin Compared to Long-Acting Insulin on Diabetic Ketoacidosis Incidence in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients
- PMID: 35280501
- PMCID: PMC8906698
- DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S351155
Effects of Ultra-Long-Acting Insulin Compared to Long-Acting Insulin on Diabetic Ketoacidosis Incidence in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients
Abstract
Purpose: This research was intended to explore the effects of new-generation basal insulin (degludec U100 And glargine U300) versus long-acting basal insulin (glargine U100, detemir) on the incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis episodes and diabetes treatment measures.
Patients and methods: This is a cross-sectional, retrospective medical record analysis. The study population included adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) who were on the hospital records in 2020. Data were collected from 221 eligible participants through review of electronic medical records. Each record was scanned for basal insulin type, total daily insulin dose, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) occurrences, and glycated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) levels. Data were collected from 6 months before to 6 months after the initiation of ultra-long-acting insulin. Statistical analysis was conducted using R version 3.5.2. The normality of distribution for each independent variable was verified using Shapiro-Wilk tests. The independent paired t-test was used to compare insulin therapy measures between the two insulin regimens. The main outcome measures were the incidence of DKA episodes and clinical outcomes associated with diabetes.
Results: The HbA1c did not change significantly before and after ultra-long-acting insulin therapy was initiated (9.9 vs 9.8, respectively; P >0.05). Insulin total daily doses were significantly higher after shifting to ultra-long-acting insulin. Sub-analysis showed higher total daily insulin doses in glargine U300 users compared with degludec U100 users (P =0.0021). However, basal insulin doses did not change after treatment with ultra-long-acting insulin. No statistically significant difference in DKA occurrences was found before and after the start of ultra-long-acting insulin treatment.
Conclusion: The frequency of DKA episodes was not affected by changing the treatment to ultra-long-acting insulin. Moreover, the results suggest that insulin dosage and types are not the only cause of uncontrolled diabetes. Additional efforts should be made to cover all factors affecting diabetes complication control.
Keywords: diabetic ketoacidosis; diabetic outcomes; insulin therapy; long-acting therapy.
© 2022 Alsofiani et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
-
- O’Keeffe DT, Maraka S, Rizza RA. HbA1c in the evaluation of diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2016;315(6):605–606. - PubMed
-
- Desai D, Mehta D, Mathias P, Menon G, Schubart UK. Health care utilization and burden of diabetic ketoacidosis in the US over the past decade: a nationwide analysis. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(8):1631–1638. - PubMed
-
- Zhong VW, Juhaeri J, Mayer-Davis EJ. Trends in hospital admission for diabetic ketoacidosis in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in England, 1998–2013: a retrospective cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(9):1870–1877. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
