Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 23:12:795265.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.795265. eCollection 2022.

Differentiation Between Benign and Metastatic Breast Lymph Nodes Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficients

Affiliations

Differentiation Between Benign and Metastatic Breast Lymph Nodes Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficients

Reza Fardanesh et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the range of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for benign axillary lymph nodes in contrast to malignant axillary lymph nodes, and to define the optimal ADC thresholds for three different ADC parameters (minimum, maximum, and mean ADC) in differentiating between benign and malignant lymph nodes. This retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent breast MRI from January 2017-December 2020. Two-year follow-up breast imaging or histopathology served as the reference standard for axillary lymph node status. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for minimum, maximum, and mean ADC (min ADC, max ADC, and mean ADC) for benign vs malignant axillary lymph nodes were determined using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, and optimal ADC thresholds were determined using Youden's Index. The final study sample consisted of 217 patients (100% female, median age of 52 years (range, 22-81), 110 with benign axillary lymph nodes and 107 with malignant axillary lymph nodes. For benign axillary lymph nodes, ADC values (×10-3 mm2/s) ranged from 0.522-2.712 for mean ADC, 0.774-3.382 for max ADC, and 0.071-2.409 for min ADC; for malignant axillary lymph nodes, ADC values (×10-3 mm2/s) ranged from 0.796-1.080 for mean ADC, 1.168-1.592 for max ADC, and 0.351-0.688 for min ADC for malignant axillary lymph nodes. While there was a statistically difference in all ADC parameters (p<0.001) between benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes, boxplots illustrate overlaps in ADC values, with the least overlap occurring with mean ADC, suggesting that this is the most useful ADC parameter for differentiating between benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes. The mean ADC threshold that resulted in the highest diagnostic accuracy for differentiating between benign and malignant lymph nodes was 1.004×10-3 mm2/s, yielding an accuracy of 75%, sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 79%, positive predictive value of 77%, and negative predictive value of 74%. This mean ADC threshold is lower than the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) mean ADC threshold of 1.300×10-3 mm2/s, therefore suggesting that the EUSOBI threshold which was recently recommended for breast tumors should not be extrapolated to evaluate the axillary lymph nodes.

Keywords: MRI; apparent diffusion coefficient; breast cancer; diffusion-weighted imaging; lymph nodes; prognostic factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

KP received payment for activities not related to the present article including lectures and service on speakers bureaus and for travel/accommodations/meeting expenses unrelated to activities listed from the European Society of Breast Imaging (MRI educational course, annual scientific meeting), AURA Health Technologies GmbH and Siemens Healthineers. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
68-year-old woman presented for high-risk screening breast MRI exam. She had a family history of cancer, and was BRCA1 and ATM positive. Breast MRI shows a benign appearing left axillary level 1 lymph node: (A) ADC, (B) T1-weighted non-fat saturated, and (C) T2-weighted fat saturated axial sequences.
Figure 2
Figure 2
49-year-old woman underwent routine screening breast MRI exam. She received a dose of the COVID vaccine in the right arm a few months prior to her breast MRI. Enlarged right axillary lymph nodes were identified on breast MRI. (A) T2-weighted fat saturated image, (B) T1-weighted fat saturated post-contrast image, and (C) ADC. She subsequently underwent diagnostic ultrasound and ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (D, E), which yielded benign results.
Figure 3
Figure 3
64-year-old woman with right breast 12:00 axis triple negative invasive ductal carcinoma and right axillary lymphadenopathy as seen on (A) ADC, (B) T1-weighted fat saturated post-contrast image. (C) Targeted ultrasound shows borderline cortical thickening of the right axillary lymph node. (D) Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration confirmed metastatic adenopathy. Note the difference in ADC values between primary breast and right axillary adenopathy, e.g., mean ADC 0.739 versus 1.111.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Boxplots for (A) mean ADC, (B) maximum ADC, and (C) minimum ADC for the differentiation between benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Receiver operating characteristic curve for (A) mean ADC, (B) maximum ADC, and (C) minimum ADC for the differentiation between benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes.

References

    1. Chetlen A, Nicholson B, Patrie JT, Harvey JA. Is Screening Detected Bilateral Axillary Adenopathy on Mammography Clinically Significant? Breast J (2012) 18:582–7. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12040 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patel T, Given-Wilson RM, Thomas V. The Clinical Importance of Axillary Lymphadenopathy Detected on Screening Mammography: Revisited. Clin Radiol (2005) 60:64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2004.05.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, et al. . Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 Mrna Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med (2020) 383:2603–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oliver S, Gargano J, Marin M, Wallace M, Curran K, Chamberland M, et al. . The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ Interim Recommendation for Use of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine — United States, December 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (2021) 69:1653–1656. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm695152e1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisher B, Bauer M, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Fisher ER, Cruz AB, et al. . Relation of Number of Positive Axillary Nodes to the Prognosis of Patients With Primary Breast Cancer. An NSABP Update. Cancer (1983) 52:1551–7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19831101)52:9<1551::aid-cncr2820520902>3.0.co;2-3 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources