Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 25:9:822201.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.822201. eCollection 2022.

Intensified Antituberculosis Therapy Regimen Containing Higher Dose Rifampin for Tuberculous Meningitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations

Intensified Antituberculosis Therapy Regimen Containing Higher Dose Rifampin for Tuberculous Meningitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mengmeng Zhang et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: Tuberculous meningitis is difficult to diagnose and is associated with high mortality. Recently, several studies evaluated the intensified regimen containing higher dose rifampin to treat tuberculous meningitis. However, this topic remains to be concluded. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate pharmacokinetics parameters, safety, and survival benefits of high-dose rifampin for tuberculous meningitis.

Method: Data were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for studies describing an antituberculosis regimen including a higher dose of rifampin for patients with tuberculous meningitis. The quality of eligible studies was evaluated via The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.3 software, the synthesis of the data was shown in mean difference (MD) or relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: There were six randomized control trails included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the concentration in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were significantly higher in the intervention group than the standard group [MD = 22.08, 95%CI (16.24, 27.92), p < 0.00001; MD = 0.74, 95%CI (0.42, 1.05), p < 0.00001], as well as the area under the time concentration curve between 0 and 24 h (AUC0-24) of rifampin [MD 203.56, 95%CI (153.07, 254.05), p < 0.00001] in plasma, but the overall survival did not improve [RR = 0.92, 95%CI (0.67, 1.26), p = 0.61]. For adverse events, the results showed a statistically significant lower incidence of hypersensitivity compared with the intervention group [RR = 1.72, 95%CI (1.13, 2.62), p = 0.01]. Fortunately, other common adverse drug reactions such as liver injury, neurological events, myelosuppression, and cardiotoxicity had no significant increase [RR = 0.98, 95%CI (0.77, 1.26), p = 0.90; RR = 1.10, 95%CI (0.94, 1.30), p = 0.23; RR = 0.82, 95%CI (0.59, 1.13), p = 0.22; RR = 1.11, 95%CI (0.66, 1.86), p = 0.70].

Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggested that the intensified treatment regimen including a higher dose of rifampin significantly increased the rifampin concentration both in the plasma and CSF, and it was safe in patients with tuberculous meningitis, but resulted in no improvement in survival rates.

Keywords: high-dose rifampin; meta-analysis; pharmacokinetics parameters; survival; tuberculous meningitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Quality assessment of the studies. (A) Risk of bias summary: Review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study; (B) risk of bias graph: Review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot result of the maximum concentration of rifampin in plasma.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot result of the AUC0-24 of rifampin.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot results of the concentration of rifampin in CSF. (A) The result in the first 3 days; (B) the result at day 14.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot result of mortality.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Forest plot results of the occurrence of adverse events. (A) The result of liver injury; (B) the result of hypersensitivity; (C) the result of neurological events; (D) the result of myelosuppression; (E) the result of cardiologic events.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization . Global Tuberculosis Report (2020).
    1. Thakur K, Das M, Dooley KE, Gupta A. The global neurological burden of tuberculosis. Semin Neurol. (2018) 38:226–37. 10.1055/s-0038-1651500 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seddon JA, Tugume L, Solomons R, Prasad K, Bahr NC. The current global situation for tuberculous meningitis: epidemiology, diagnostics, treatment and outcomes. Wellcome Open Res. (2019) 4:167. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15535.1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilkinson RJ, Rohlwink U, Misra UK, van Crevel R, Mai NTH, Dooley KE, et al. . Tuberculous meningitis. Nat Rev Neurol. (2017) 13:581–98. 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.120 - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee . Treatment of Tuberculosis: Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; (2010).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources