Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 25:9:767987.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.767987. eCollection 2022.

Updated Insights on Cardiac and Vascular Risks of Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study

Affiliations

Updated Insights on Cardiac and Vascular Risks of Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study

Yinghong Zhai et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most widely prescribed medications in clinical practice. However, there are also concerns about the potential risks of long-term PPI use. The present study aimed to examine the safety of PPIs and summarize their potential cardiac and vascular risks in a real-world setting.

Methods: This pharmacovigilance study extracted records between January 2015 and December 2019 from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The association of seven PPI medications with cardiac and vascular events (CVEs) were evaluated. Two established pharmacovigilance methods, reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information components (IC) based statistical shrinkage, were used to measure disproportionality.

Results: In total 62,140 CVE records associated with PPI use were investigated. Women showed a higher proportion (54.37%) of PPI-associated CVEs. The median time from PPI initiation to CVE onset was 97 [interquartile range (IQR): 8-491] days, with the shortest median time of 42 days (IQR: 2-277 days) for esomeprazole, and the longest time of 389 days (IQR: 0-525 days) for dexlansoprazole. Although PPIs were not associated with elevated CVE risks compared those of the whole database (IC025/ROR025 = -0.39/0.74), various signals emerged. Despite some similarities exist between the PPIs, their cardiac and vascular safety profiles varied significantly. Pantoprazole showed the broadest spectrum of signals, from thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (IC025/ROR025 = 0.01/1.08) to renal haemangioma (IC025/ROR025 = 3.14/9.58). Esomeprazole showed the second-broadest spectrum of toxicities, ranging from duodenal ulcer hemorrhage (IC025/ROR025 = 0.07/1.28) to hypertensive nephropathy (IC025/ROR025 = 4.09/18.72). Vascular signals were more dominant than cardiac signals, suggesting that vascular function was more heavily affected. Hypertensive nephropathy, renal haemangioma, renal artery stenosis, and renal infarct had strong signals across most PPI regimens and merited further attention.

Conclusions: PPIs may inflict various CVEs, particularly those involving the vascular system, on the users. Given the wide range of onset times and different toxicity profiles for various PPI medications, they should be prescribed with caution.

Keywords: FAERS database; cardiac; disproportionality analysis; proton pump inhibitors; vascular.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the record selection process from the U.S. food and drug administration adverse events reporting system database.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A,B) Cardiac and vascular toxicity profiles of different proton pump inhibitor regimens.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Composition proportion of the identified signals. (B) Association between several highlighted adverse events and different proton pump inhibitor drugs quantified by the information components value.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Corsonello A, Lattanzio F. Cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular concerns with proton pump inhibitors: are they safe? Trends Cardiovasc Med. (2019) 29:353–60. 10.1016/j.tcm.2018.10.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gomm W, von Holt K, Thomé F, Broich K, Maier W, Fink A, et al. . Association of proton pump inhibitors with risk of dementia: a pharmacoepidemiological claims data analysis. JAMA Neurol. (2016) 73:410–6. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.4791 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Freedberg DE, Kim LS, Yang Y. The risks and benefits of long-term use of proton pump inhibitors: expert review and best practice advice from the American Gastroenterological Association. Gastroenterology. (2017) 152:706–15. 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.01.031 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wan QY, Wu XT Li N, Du L, Zhou Y. Long-term proton pump inhibitors use and risk of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of 926 386 participants. Gut. (2019) 68:762–4. 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316416 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poly TN, Islam MM, Yang HC, Wu CC Li YJ. Proton pump inhibitors and risk of hip fracture: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Osteoporosis Int. (2019) 30:103–14. 10.1007/s00198-018-4788-y - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources