Quantitative Evaluation of Post-stenotic Blood Flow Disturbance in Canine Femoral Artery Stenosis Model: An Early Experience With Vector Flow Imaging
- PMID: 35282375
- PMCID: PMC8907590
- DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.829825
Quantitative Evaluation of Post-stenotic Blood Flow Disturbance in Canine Femoral Artery Stenosis Model: An Early Experience With Vector Flow Imaging
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum: Quantitative evaluation of post-stenotic blood flow disturbance in canine femoral artery stenosis model: An early experience with vector flow imaging.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 20;9:979992. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.979992. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 35935650 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the value of Vector Flow Imaging (V Flow) in the assessment of post-stenotic turbulence in the canine arterial stenosis model.
Materials and methods: Canine femoral artery stenosis models were established using ameroid constrictors in 12 beagle dogs. 50% and then 70% femoral artery stenoses were confirmed by selective femoral artery angiography. V Flow was used to measure femoral artery flow turbulence index (Tur) preoperatively as a baseline. After establishing of a 50% and then 70% stenoses, the Tur indices were recorded in the femoral artery at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, and 19 mm distal to the stenosis.
Results: Baseline Tur indices of normal canine femoral arteries were <1% in 11 of 12 cases (91.7%). Distal to a 50% stenosis, the Tur index (>1%) was recorded in 83.3-100% cases between 1 and 9 mm, 41.7-58.3% between 11 and 17 mm, and 16.7% at 19 mm. For a 70% stenosis, the Tur index (>1%) occurred in 81.8-100% cases between 1 and 17 mm distal to the stenosis, and 63.6% at 19 mm. The Tur index peaked around 7 mm or 2.3 times of the initial vessel diameter (3 mm) downstream for a 50% stenosis and 11 mm or 3.7 times of vessel diameter downstream for a 70% stenosis.
Conclusion: V Flow with Tur index measurement adds quantitative information of post-stenotic turbulence when assessing an arterial stenosis with ultrasound. Tur index of 1% seems a useful threshold for assessment of flow turbulence in this small sample study. Further studies with larger sample size are needed to evaluate the value of V Flow in clinical applications.
Keywords: Doppler; arterial stenosis; duplex ultrasound; femoral artery; post-stenotic turbulence; vector flow imaging.
Copyright © 2022 Zhao, Zheng, Wang, Du, Tong and Wen.
Conflict of interest statement
YD is employed by Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures







References
-
- Seifert H, Jäger K. Diagnostic value of duplex scanning in peripheral vascular disease. Vasc Med Rev. (1990) 1:21–33. 10.1177/1358836X9000100103 - DOI
-
- Gerhard-Herman M, Gardin JM, Jaff M, Mohler E, Roman M, Naqvi TZ„ et al. Guidelines for noninvasive vascular laboratory testing: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Vascular Medicine and Biology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. (2006) 19:955–72. 10.1016/j.echo.2006.04.019 - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources