Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma
- PMID: 35283441
- DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002012
Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma
Abstract
Prcis: We assessed the readability of online glaucoma patient education materials using seven validated instruments. Overall, glaucoma materials were written at a 10th to 11th grade level, above the recommended seventh grade reading level.
Purpose: Online health information is increasingly used by patients, yet previous studies show online patient education materials are often difficult to understand. As such, the American Medical Association recommends that patient education materials are written at or below a seventh grade reading level. This study aimed to assess the readability of online glaucoma patient education materials.
Methods: Glaucoma was entered into the Google search engine, and the first 30 search results were assessed for readability using seven validated readability instruments. Scientific articles, forums, and dictionary entries were excluded. Single sample t tests were used to assess whether online glaucoma materials were written above the recommended seventh grade level.
Results: Overall, glaucoma materials were written at a mean grade level of 10.33 (SD: 2.02). Across 6 grade level readability instruments, these patient education materials were written above the recommended seventh grade reading level (P<0.0001 for all). Glaucoma education materials only on the first page of Google search results were of a similar reading level: mean 10.56 (SD: 2.13). The readability instruments used in this study showed strong consistency.
Conclusions: Glaucoma patient education materials are written above the recommended reading level to promote accessibility of education materials. This may contribute to lower patient engagement, worse clinical outcomes, and greater racial and ethnic disparities in glaucoma management. There is a need for reliable, simple glaucoma information to improve patient outcomes.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: A.P.T.: Ivantis (Consultant); Sandoz (Consultant), Zeiss (Consultant); Google (Grant Support). The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Finney Rutten LJ, Blake KD, Greenberg-Worisek AJ, et al. Online health information seeking among US adults: measuring progress toward a healthy people 2020 objective. Public Health Rep. 2019;134:617–625.
-
- Kang JM, Chatterjee A, Rosdahl JA, et al. Health literacy and success with glaucoma drop administration. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022;5:26–31.
-
- Cunningham PJ, Hibbard J, Gibbons CB. Raising low “patient activation” rates among Hispanic immigrants may equal expanded coverage in reducing access disparities. Health Affairs (Project Hope). 2011;30:1888–1894.
-
- Eneanya ND, Winter M, Cabral H, et al. Health literacy and education as mediators of racial disparities in patient activation within an elderly patient cohort. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016;27:1427–1440.
-
- Jeppesen KM, Coyle JD, Miser WF. Screening questions to predict limited health literacy: a cross-sectional study of patients with diabetes mellitus. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7:24–31.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
