Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 25:10:843164.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.843164. eCollection 2022.

Psychrometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale in Primary Care

Affiliations

Psychrometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale in Primary Care

Hazem A Sayed Ahmed et al. Front Public Health. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: The Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale is a reliable and valid tool that is widely used for diabetes-distress screening, but the Arabic version of the scale lacks validity and reliability analysis in primary healthcare (PHC) patients. Our study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the PAID (AR-PAID) scale among Egyptian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in PHC settings.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study on a convenience sample of 200 patients from six rural PHC settings in the Ismailia governorate. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to test the goodness-of-fit to the predefined models of the PAID. Convergent construct was evaluated through correlations with the Arabic versions of the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), and 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5), additionally glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Discriminant validity was evaluated through associations with patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Reliability was evaluated through internal consistency (Cronbach's α) and test-retest reliability analysis (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC).

Results: The CFA demonstrated the best fit for a four-factor model. The AR-PAID was significantly correlated with the following measures: PHQ-9 (rho = 0.71, p < 0.001), GAD-7 (rho = 0.50, p < 0.001), WHO-5 (rho = -0.69, p < 0.001), and HbA1c (rho = 0.36, p < 0.001), supporting sound convergent validity. Discriminant validity was satisfactory demonstrated. Internal consistency was excellent (α = 0.96) and test-retest reliability was stable (ICC = 0.97).

Conclusions: The AR-PAID scale is a valid and reliable instrument for diabetes-distress screening in primary care patients with T2DM that can be used in clinical settings and research. Further research is needed to validate short forms of the AR-PAID scale.

Keywords: Arabic; PAID; diabetes-distress; primary healthcare; type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of total AR-PAID score by patients' demographic and clinical characteristics: age, gender, and co-morbidities (A), diabetes-related characteristics (B), and depression, anxiety, and WHO-wellbeing scales (C). *Indicates a statistically significant p < 0.05. DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; WHO-5, 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index.

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation,. IDF Diabetes Atlas . 9th ed. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; (2019). Available online at: https://www.diabetesatlas.org/upload/resources/material/20200302_133351_...
    1. Perrin NE, Davies MJ, Robertson N, Snoek FJ, Khunti K. The prevalence of diabetes-specific emotional distress in people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. (2017) 34:1508–20. 10.1111/dme.13448 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Strycker LA. The relationship between diabetes distress and clinical depression with glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. (2010) 33:1034–6. 10.2337/dc09-2175 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisher L, Hessler DM, Polonsky WH, Mullan J. When is diabetes distress clinically meaningful?: establishing cut points for the diabetes distress scale. Diabetes Care. (2012) 35:259–64. 10.2337/dc11-1572 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Snoek FJ, Bremmer MA, Hermanns N. Constructs of depression and distress in diabetes: time for an appraisal. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2015) 3:450–60. 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00135-7 - DOI - PubMed

Substances