A clinical tool to identify older women with back pain at high risk of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (Vfrac): a population-based cohort study with exploratory economic evaluation
- PMID: 35284926
- PMCID: PMC8918203
- DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac031
A clinical tool to identify older women with back pain at high risk of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (Vfrac): a population-based cohort study with exploratory economic evaluation
Abstract
Background: osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) identify people at high risk of future fractures, but despite this, less than a third come to clinical attention. The objective of this study was to develop a clinical tool to aid health care professionals decide which older women with back pain should have a spinal radiograph.
Methods: a population-based cohort of 1,635 women aged 65+ years with self-reported back pain in the previous 4 months were recruited from primary care. Exposure data were collected through self-completion questionnaires and physical examination, including descriptions of back pain and traditional risk factors for osteoporosis. Outcome was the presence/absence of OVFs on spinal radiographs. Logistic regression models identified independent predictors of OVFs, with the area under the (receiver operating) curve calculated for the final model, and a cut-point was identified.
Results: mean age was 73.9 years and 209 (12.8%) had OVFs. The final Vfrac model comprised 15 predictors of OVF, with an AUC of 0.802 (95% CI: 0.764-0.840). Sensitivity was 72.4% and specificity was 72.9%. Vfrac identified 93% of those with more than one OVF and two-thirds of those with one OVF. Performance was enhanced by inclusion of self-reported back pain descriptors, removal of which reduced AUC to 0.742 (95% CI: 0.696-0.788) and sensitivity to 66.5%. Health economic modelling to support a future trial was favourable.
Conclusions: the Vfrac clinical tool appears to be valid and is improved by the addition of self-reported back pain symptoms. The tool now requires testing to establish real-world clinical and cost-effectiveness.
Keywords: Osteoporosis; Vfrac; back pain; cohort study; older people; vertebral fractures.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures
References
-
- Kaptoge S, Armbrecht G, Felsenberg D et al. When should the doctor order a spine X-ray? Identifying vertebral fractures for osteoporosis care: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). J Bone Miner Res 2004; 19: 1982–93. - PubMed
-
- Ismail AA, Cockerill W, Cooper C et al. Prevalent vertebral deformity predicts incident hip though not distal forearm fracture: results from the European prospective osteoporosis study. Osteoporos Int 2001; 12: 85–90. - PubMed
-
- Scane AC, Sutcliffe AM, Francis RM. The sequelae of vertebral crush fractures in men. Osteoporos Int Mar 1994; 4: 89–92. - PubMed
-
- NICE . TA 464: bisphosphonates for treating osteoporosis. 2017. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta464. ISBN: 978-1-4731-2624-4.
-
- Estell EG, Rosen CJ. Emerging insights into the comparative effectiveness of anabolic therapies for osteoporosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2021; 17: 31–46. - PubMed
