Deep learning method with a convolutional neural network for image classification of normal and metastatic axillary lymph nodes on breast ultrasonography
- PMID: 35284996
- DOI: 10.1007/s11604-022-01261-6
Deep learning method with a convolutional neural network for image classification of normal and metastatic axillary lymph nodes on breast ultrasonography
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the ability of deep learning (DL) using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for distinguishing between normal and metastatic axillary lymph nodes on ultrasound images by comparing the diagnostic performance of radiologists.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively gathered 300 images of normal and 328 images of axillary lymph nodes with breast cancer metastases for training. A DL model using the CNN architecture Xception was developed to analyze test data of 50 normal and 50 metastatic lymph nodes. A board-certified radiologist with 12 years' experience. (Reader 1) and two residents with 3- and 1-year experience (Readers 2, 3), respectively, scored these test data with and without the assistance of the DL system for the possibility of metastasis. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated.
Results: Our DL model had a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 88%, and an AUC of 0.966. The AUC of the DL model was not significantly different from that of Reader 1 (0.969; p = 0.881) and higher than that of Reader 2 (0.913; p = 0.101) and Reader 3 (0.810; p < 0.001). With the DL support, the AUCs of Readers 2 and 3 increased to 0.960 and 0.937, respectively, which were comparable to those of Reader 1 (p = 0.138 and 0.700, respectively).
Conclusion: Our DL model demonstrated great diagnostic performance for differentiating benign from malignant axillary lymph nodes on breast ultrasound and for potentially providing effective diagnostic support to residents.
Keywords: Axillary lymph node metastases; Breast cancer; Convolutional neural network; Deep learning; Ultrasound.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Radiological Society.
Similar articles
-
Lymph Node Metastasis Prediction from Primary Breast Cancer US Images Using Deep Learning.Radiology. 2020 Jan;294(1):19-28. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190372. Epub 2019 Nov 19. Radiology. 2020. PMID: 31746687
-
Deep Learning Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients Using Clinical Implication-Applied Preprocessed CT Images.Curr Oncol. 2024 Apr 18;31(4):2278-2288. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31040169. Curr Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38668072 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Breast Cancer Through Multimodal Deep Learning Based on Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Images.Acad Radiol. 2025 Jan;32(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.07.029. Epub 2024 Aug 5. Acad Radiol. 2025. PMID: 39107188
-
Deep learning-based breast MRI for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer Imaging. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40644-025-00863-3. Cancer Imaging. 2025. PMID: 40165212 Free PMC article.
-
Emerging uses of artificial intelligence in breast and axillary ultrasound.Clin Imaging. 2023 Aug;100:64-68. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.05.007. Epub 2023 May 13. Clin Imaging. 2023. PMID: 37243994 Review.
Cited by
-
Ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in invasive breast cancer.Am J Transl Res. 2024 Jun 15;16(6):2398-2410. doi: 10.62347/KEPZ9726. eCollection 2024. Am J Transl Res. 2024. PMID: 39006270 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of AI in Breast Cancer Lymph Node Classification: A Comprehensive Review.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 21;15(8):2400. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082400. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37190328 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Artificial intelligence performance in ultrasound-based lymph node diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Cancer. 2025 Jan 13;25(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13447-y. BMC Cancer. 2025. PMID: 39806293 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of large language models on radiology: a guide for radiologists on the latest innovations in AI.Jpn J Radiol. 2024 Jul;42(7):685-696. doi: 10.1007/s11604-024-01552-0. Epub 2024 Mar 29. Jpn J Radiol. 2024. PMID: 38551772 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in liver imaging.Radiol Med. 2023 Jun;128(6):655-667. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01638-1. Epub 2023 May 10. Radiol Med. 2023. PMID: 37165151 Review.
References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:7–30. - DOI
-
- Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011;305:569–75. - DOI
-
- Fujioka T, Mori M, Kubota K, et al. Clinical usefulness of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and core needle biopsy for patients with axillary lymphadenopathy. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;57:722. - DOI
-
- Kikuchi Y, Mori M, Fujioka T, et al. Feasibility of ultrafast dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastasis: a case report. Eur J Radiol Open. 2020;7:100261. - DOI
-
- Mori M, Fujioka T, Katsuta L, et al. Diagnostic performance of time-of-flight PET/CT for evaluating nodal metastasis of the axilla in breast cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2019;40:958–64. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical