Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;32(1-2):174-190.
doi: 10.1111/jocn.16285. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

'It enables the carers to see the person first': Qualitative evaluation of point-of-care digital management system in residential aged care

Affiliations

'It enables the carers to see the person first': Qualitative evaluation of point-of-care digital management system in residential aged care

Kasia Bail et al. J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To evaluate acceptability, efficiency, and quality of a new digital care management system in a residential aged care home (RACH).

Background: Improving care quality and efficiency in RACH, while simultaneously upgrading data management, is a priority for communities and governments.

Design: Participatory action research with mixed methods data collection was employed to evaluate a digital care management system implemented at a 169-bed RACH. This paper reports qualitative findings of the 2-year evaluation.

Methods: Qualitative data were collected using focus groups with residents, visitors, nurses, managers, care workers, and consultants; resident/visitor and staff hallway interviews and responses to open-ended questions in online staff surveys. Data were analysed thematically under the four predetermined study objectives. Reporting adhered to COREQ guidelines.

Results: 325 data captures from 88 participants, over seven data sources were coded. Findings indicate that the system was acceptable to both residents and staff due to perceptions of time-saving and improved quality of care. Increased efficiency was perceived through timeliness as well as reduced time spent retrieving and documenting information. Quality of care was improved through care scheduling individualised to resident needs, with reminders to avoid missed care. Relatives were reassured and activities were scheduled to loved one's preferences. The co-design implementation process was successful through commitment to quality from leadership teams and prioritising the focus on the holistic needs of the residents.

Conclusion: A strong emphasis on co-design with care staff in developing and implementing the digital care system contributed to a system that supported nursing and care work, facilitated reporting and documentation, and improved resident care and well-being including identification of missed care.

Relevance to clinical practice: Nurses, carers, administrators, and advocates can support the co-design creation of information systems that suit the workflow of an organisation and keep the focus on individualised models of care provision.

Keywords: dementia; efficiency - organisational; geriatrics; long-term care; nursing; nursing homes; nursing informatics; patient-centred care; point-of-care systems; quality of health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

As part of the funding agreement, the funders were able to review manuscript content prior to submission but were unable to withhold consent for publication or demand any changes.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Project timeline and data collection
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Topic guide

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akhu‐Zaheya, L. , Al‐Maaitah, R. , & Bany Hani, S. (2018). Quality of nursing documentation: Paper‐based health records versus electronic‐based health records. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(3‐4), 3–4. 10.1111/jocn.14097 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ausserhofer, D. , Zander, B. , Busse, R. , Schubert, M. , De Geest, S. , Rafferty, A. M. , Ball, J. , Scott, A. , Kinnunen, J. , Heinen, M. , Sjetne, I. S. , Moreno‐Casbas, T. , Kozka, M. , Lindqvist, R. , Diomidous, M. , Bruyneel, L. , Sermeus, W. , Aiken, L. H. , Schwendimann, R. & Consortium RC (2014). Prevalence, patterns and predictors of nursing care left undone in European hospitals: results from the multicountry cross‐sectional RN4CAST study. Bmj Quality & Safety, 23(2), 126–135. 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002318 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Australian College of Nursing HISOA, Nursing Informatics Australia (2017). Nursing Informatics Position Statement. https://www.acn.edu.au/wp‐content/uploads/joint‐position‐statement‐nursi...
    1. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (2017). National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. ACSQHC, Sydney.
    1. Bail, K. , Davey, R. , Currie, M. , Gibson, J. , Merrick, E. , & Redley, B. (2020). Implementation pilot of a novel electronic bedside nursing chart: a mixed‐method case study. Australian Health Review, 44(5), 672. - PubMed