Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 15;145(11):847-863.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057687. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

Clinical Trial Design Principles and Outcomes Definitions for Device-Based Therapies for Hypertension: A Consensus Document From the Hypertension Academic Research Consortium

Affiliations
Review

Clinical Trial Design Principles and Outcomes Definitions for Device-Based Therapies for Hypertension: A Consensus Document From the Hypertension Academic Research Consortium

David E Kandzari et al. Circulation. .

Abstract

The clinical implications of hypertension in addition to a high prevalence of both uncontrolled blood pressure and medication nonadherence promote interest in developing device-based approaches to hypertension treatment. The expansion of device-based therapies and ongoing clinical trials underscores the need for consistency in trial design, conduct, and definitions of clinical study elements to permit trial comparability and data poolability. Standardizing methods of blood pressure assessment, effectiveness measures beyond blood pressure alone, and safety outcomes are paramount. The Hypertension Academic Research Consortium (HARC) document represents an integration of evolving evidence and consensus opinion among leading experts in cardiovascular medicine and hypertension research with regulatory perspectives on clinical trial design and methodology. The HARC document integrates the collective information among device-based therapies for hypertension to better address existing challenges and identify unmet needs for technologies proposed to treat the world's leading cause of death and disability. Consistent with the Academic Research Consortium charter, this document proposes pragmatic consensus clinical design principles and outcomes definitions for studies aimed at evaluating device-based hypertension therapies.

Keywords: clinical trials; hypertension; outcomes; renal denervation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Change in systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) after renal denervation in 6 prospective, randomized, sham-controlled trials. ABPM indicates ambulatory blood pressure measurement; BP, blood pressure; RADIANCE HTN SOLO, Study of the ReCor Medical Paradise System in Clinical Hypertension in Absence of Hypertension Medications; RADIANCE-HTN TRIO, Study of the ReCor Medical Paradise System in Clinical Hypertension in the Presence of a Stabilized, Single Pill, Triple, Fixed Dose Antihypertensive Medication Regimen; SYMPLICITY HTN-3 trial, Renal Denervation in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension; SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED, Global Clinical Study of Renal Denervation With the Symplicity Spyral Multi-Electrode Renal Denervation System in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension in the Absence of Antihypertensive Medications; SPYRAL HTN-OFF PIVOTAL, Global Clinical Study of Renal Denervation With the Symplicity Spyral Multi-Electrode Renal Denervation System in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension in the Absence of Antihypertensive Medications Pivotal; and SPYRAL HTN ON MED, Global Clinical Study of Renal Denervation With the Symplicity Spyral Multi-Electrode Renal Denervation System in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension on Standard Medical Therapy. Adapted from references 15, 17–21.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Clinical investigation recommendations for novel devices for hypertension management. ABPM indicates ambulatory blood pressure measurement; BP, blood pressure; CKD, chronic kidney disease; HF, heart failure; HTN, hypertension; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; and MI, myocardial infarction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet. 2005; 365:217–223. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17741-1 - PubMed
    1. Egan BM, Li J, Hutchison FN, Ferdinand KC. Hypertension in the United States, 1999 to 2012: progress toward Healthy People 2020 goals. Circulation. 2014; 130:1692–1699. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010676 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muntner P, Carey RM, Gidding S, Jones DW, Taler SJ, Wright JT, Jr, Whelton PK. Potential US population impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure Guideline. Circulation. 2018; 137:109–118. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032582 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muntner P, Hardy ST, Fine LJ, Jaeger BC, Wozniak G, Levitan EB, Colantonio LD. Trends in blood pressure control among US adults with hypertension, 1999-2000 to 2017-2018. JAMA. 2020; 324:1190–1200. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.14545 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, Bravata DM, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, et al. ; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012; 125:e2–e220. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ac046 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types