Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;36(4):625-651.
doi: 10.1177/02692163221077850. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

Civic engagement in serious illness, death, and loss: A systematic mixed-methods review

Affiliations

Civic engagement in serious illness, death, and loss: A systematic mixed-methods review

Louise D'Eer et al. Palliat Med. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Background: New public health approaches to palliative care such as compassionate communities aim to increase capacity in serious illness, death, and loss by involving civic society. Civic engagement has been described in many domains of health; a description of the characteristics, processes, and impact of the initiatives in palliative care is lacking.

Aim: To systematically describe and compare civic engagement initiatives in palliative care in terms of context, development, impact, and evaluation methods.

Design: Systematic, mixed-methods review using a convergent integrated synthesis approach. Registered in Prospero: CRD42020180688.

Data sources: Six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Sociological Abstracts, WOS, Embase, PsycINFO) were searched up to November 2021 for publications in English describing civic engagement in serious illness, death, and loss. Additional grey literature was obtained by contacting the first authors. We performed a quality appraisal of the included studies.

Results: We included 23 peer-reviewed and 11 grey literature publications, reporting on nineteen unique civic engagement initiatives, mostly in countries with English as one of the official languages. Initiatives involved the community in their development, often through a community-academic partnership. Activities aimed to connect people with palliative care needs to individuals or resources in the community. There was a variety of evaluation aims, methods, outcomes, and strength of evidence. Information on whether or how to sustain the initiatives was generally lacking.

Conclusions: This is the first review to systematically describe and compare reported civic engagement initiatives in the domain of palliative care. Future studies would benefit from improved evaluation of impact and sustainability.

Keywords: Civic engagement; community development; community participation; compassionate communities; palliative care; public health; systematic review; volunteers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flowchart of the study identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion process.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Geographic distribution of the initiatives.

References

    1. Cohen J, Deliens L. Applying a public health perspective to end-of-life care. In: Cohen J, Deliens L. (eds) A public health perspective on end of life care. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp.3–18.
    1. World Health Organization. World report on ageing and health. Report. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015.
    1. Abel J, Kellehear A. Palliative care reimagined: a needed shift. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2016; 6(1): 21–26. - PubMed
    1. Clark D. Controversies in palliative care: a matter of definition, http://endoflifestudies.academicblogs.co.uk/controversies-in-palliative-... (2018, accessed 23 February 2021).
    1. Sallnow L, Tishelman C, Lindqvist O, et al.. Research in public health and end-of-life care – building on the past and developing the new. Prog Palliat Care 2016; 24: 25–30. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types