Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):2041360.
doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2041360. Epub 2022 Mar 15.

Factors influencing healthcare professionals' confidence in vaccination in Europe: a literature review

Affiliations
Review

Factors influencing healthcare professionals' confidence in vaccination in Europe: a literature review

D Pavlovic et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother. .

Abstract

Health-care professionals (HCPs) have a fundamental role in vaccination, their own beliefs and attitudes affecting both their uptake and recommendation of vaccines. This literature review (n = 89) summarises evidence on HCPs' perceptions of the risks and benefits of vaccination, trust, and perceptions of mandatory vaccination in Europe. HCPs across studies believed that vaccination is important to protect themselves and their patients. However, beliefs that some diseases such as influenza are less risky were reported by some HCPs as a reason for not getting vaccinated. Concerns about both short- and long-term side effects were identified among HCPs in most studies, such as those affecting the immune or neurological system. Mistrust toward health authorities and pharmaceutical industry was reported in some studies. The question of mandatory vaccination revealed mixed opinions, with some favoring self-determination and others viewing vaccination as a duty. This review highlights key factors influencing HCPs' confidence in vaccination in Europe.

Keywords: Health-care professionals; beliefs; benefits; confidence; effectiveness; mandatory; risks; safety; trust; vaccine hesitancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

HJL/EK are part of research projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK), Merck Sharp & Dohme Limited (Merck), and Janssen; and received support for participating in Merck and GSK meetings. HJL is a member of the Merck Vaccine Confidence Advisory Board. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA Flowchart.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Number of studies by country and vaccine.

References

    1. Rodrigues CMC, Plotkin SA.. Impact of vaccines. Health Econ Soc Perspect Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1526. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hadjipanayis A, van Esso D, Del Torso S, Dornbusch HJ, Michailidou K, Minicuci N, Pancheva R, Mujkic A, Geitmann K, Syridou G, et al. Vaccine confidence among parents: Large scale study in eighteen European countries. Vaccine. 2020;38:1505–15. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.068. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stoeckel F, Carter C, Lyons BA, Reifler J. Association of vaccine hesitancy and immunization coverage rates in the European Union. Vaccine. 2021;39(29):3935–39. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.062. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Figueiredo A, Simas C, Karafillakis E, Paterson P, Larson HJ. Mapping global trends in vaccine confidence and investigating barriers to vaccine uptake: a large-scale retrospective temporal modelling study. Lancet. 2020;396(10255):898–908. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31558-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karafillakis E, Larson HJ, consortium A . The benefit of the doubt or doubts over benefits? A systematic literature review of perceived risks of vaccines in European populations. Vaccine. 2017;35:4840–50. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.061. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances