Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022:34:102986.
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.102986. Epub 2022 Mar 9.

Differential neural sensitivity to social inclusion and exclusion in adolescents in foster care

Affiliations

Differential neural sensitivity to social inclusion and exclusion in adolescents in foster care

Nandita Vijayakumar et al. Neuroimage Clin. 2022.

Abstract

Objectives: Adolescents in foster care may exhibit differential patterns of brain functioning that contribute to their pervasive socioemotional challenges. However, there has been limited investigation of implicated neural processes, particularly in the social domain. Thus, the current study investigated neural responses to exclusionary and inclusionary peer interactions in adolescents in foster-care.

Methods: Participants comprised adolescents aged 11-18 years in foster care (N = 69) and a community sample (N = 69). They completed an fMRI adaptation of Cyberball, a virtual ball-throwing paradigm, that included periods of exclusion and over-inclusion. To investigate neural sensitivity to peer social experiences, we quantified neural responses that scaled with consecutive inclusionary and exclusionary interactions (using parametric modulators).

Results: Relative to the community sample, adolescents in foster care exhibited increasing response to consecutive exclusionary events in lateral prefrontal regions and decreasing response to consecutive inclusionary events in the intraparietal sulcus and temporo-occipital cortex. Further, exploratory analyses revealed that dorsolateral prefrontal activation to exclusion was related to externalizing problems, particularly in the foster care sample.

Conclusions: Findings highlight greater neural sensitivity to exclusionary, and lesser sensitivity to inclusionary, peer interactions in adolescents in foster care. Engagement of prefrontal clusters may reflect greater salience and emotion regulatory processes during exclusion, while parietal and temporal clusters may reflect reduced attention and behavioural engagement during inclusion. Thus foster care involvement is associated with broad changes in neural responses during peer interactions, and further these potentially relate to externalizing problems that have been identified in this vulnerable population.

Keywords: Adolescence; Cyberball; Foster care; Social exclusion; Social inclusion; fMRI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Group differences in BOLD response to a) parametric modulator conditions and b) simple effects for Increasing Exclusion, with selected interaction patterns illustrated. Results are FWE cluster-corrected at p < 0.05 (voxel-wise p < 0.001, k = 68). IPS: intraparietal sulcus; OFC: orbitofrontal cortex.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Associations between ROI response and adversity highlight the rostrolateral (rlPFC) and left dorsolateral (dlPFC) prefrontal cortices, as well as the right intraparietal sulcus (IPS). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.006 (significant following Bonferroni correction for 8 ROIs). ACE: Adverse Childhood Experiences, total score; Exc: Increasing Exclusion; Exc > Inc: Increasing Exclusion > Increasing Inclusion; R: correlation coefficient; lOFC: lateral orbitofrontal cortex; temp_occ: temporooccipital cortex; prec: precuneus.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a) Associations between ROI response and mental health problems. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.004 (significant following Sidak adjustment for two correlated CBCL scales and Bonferroni correction for 8 ROIs). Exc: Increasing Exclusion; Exc > Inc: Increasing Exclusion > Increasing Inclusion; R: correlation coefficient; rlPFC: rostrolateral prefrontal cortex; lOFC: lateral orbitofrontal cortex; dlPFC: dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; IPS: intraparietal sulcus; temp_occ: temporooccipital cortex; prec: precuneus. b) Correlations between externalizing problems and left dlPFC response to Increasing Exclusion within each group reveal stronger brain-behavior correlations in foster care youth.

References

    1. Achenbach T. The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 1999. The Child Behavior Checklist and related instruments; pp. 429–466.
    1. Alegria A.A., Radua J., Rubia K. Meta-analysis of fMRI studies of disruptive behavior disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2016;173(11):1119–1130. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15081089. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anthonysamy A., Zimmer-Gembeck M.J. Peer status and behaviors of maltreated children and their classmates in the early years of school. Child Abuse Negl. 2007;31(9):971–991. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.04.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baldwin J.R., Reuben A., Newbury J.B., Danese A. Agreement between prospective and retrospective measures of childhood maltreatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(6):584–593. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0097. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banny A.M., Cicchetti D., Rogosch F.A., Oshri A., Crick N.R. Vulnerability to depression: a moderated mediation model of the roles of child maltreatment, peer victimization, and serotonin transporter linked polymorphic region genetic variation among children from low socioeconomic status backgrounds. Dev. Psychopathol. 2013;25(3):599–614. doi: 10.1017/S0954579413000047. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types