Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 7;131(1):11-16.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac024.

Does one subgenome become dominant in the formation and evolution of a polyploid?

Affiliations

Does one subgenome become dominant in the formation and evolution of a polyploid?

Chunji Liu et al. Ann Bot. .

Abstract

Background: Polyploids are common in flowering plants and they tend to have more expanded ranges of distributions than their diploid progenitors. Possible mechanisms underlying polyploid success have been intensively investigated. Previous studies showed that polyploidy generates novel changes and that subgenomes in allopolyploid species often differ in gene number, gene expression levels and levels of epigenetic alteration. It is widely believed that such differences are the results of conflicts among the subgenomes. These differences have been treated by some as subgenome dominance, and it is claimed that the magnitude of subgenome dominance increases in polyploid evolution.

Scope: In addition to changes which occurred during evolution, differences between subgenomes of a polyploid species may also be affected by differences between the diploid donors and changes which occurred during polyploidization. The variable genome components in many plant species are extensive, which would result in exaggerated differences between a subgenome and its progenitor when a single genotype or a small number of genotypes are used to represent a polyploid or its donors. When artificially resynthesized polyploids are used as surrogates for newly formed genotypes which have not been exposed to evolutionary selection, differences between diploid genotypes available today and those involved in the formation of the natural polyploid genotypes must also be considered.

Conclusions: Contrary to the now widely held views that subgenome biases in polyploids are the results of conflicts among the subgenomes and that one of the parental subgenomes generally retains more genes which are more highly expressed, available results show that subgenome biases mainly reflect legacy from the progenitors and that they can be detected before the completion of polyploidization events. Further, there is no convincing evidence that the magnitudes of subgenome biases have significantly changed during evolution for any of the allopolyploid species assessed.

Keywords: Polyploidy; polyploid evolution; subgenome dominance; variable genome; whole-genome duplications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
A diagram illustrating two possible scenarios of subgenome biases in polyploid formation and evolution as discussed herein, one being that the degree of increases of subgenome biases over time (A) and the other that subgenome biases mainly reflect differences between diploid donors (B). Each of the four oval shapes contained in each of the nuclei (circles) represents a haploid gamete produced by a diploid individual. Darker colours represent higher degrees of subgenome biases.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
A diagram showing the major steps, thus factors that need to be considered, in studying subgenome biases in the formation and evolution of allopolyploids. Six individuals are used to represent each of the populations for both the diploid donors and the natural polyploids derived from them.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alger EI, Edger PP. 2020. One subgenome to rule them all: underlying mechanisms of subgenome dominance. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 54: 108–113. - PubMed
    1. Alix K, Gérard PR, Schwarzacher T, Heslop-Harrison JS. 2017. Polyploidy and interspecific hybridization: partners for adaptation, speciation and evolution in plants. Annals of Botany 120: 183–194. - PMC - PubMed
    1. te Beest M, Le Roux JJ, Richardson DM, et al. 2012. The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. Annals of Botany 109: 19–45. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bird KA, Niederhuth CE, Ou S, et al. 2021. Replaying the evolutionary tape to investigate subgenome dominance in allopolyploid Brassica napus. New Phytologist 230: 354–371. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blanc G, Barakat A, Guyot R, Cook R, Delseny M. 2000. Extensive duplication and reshuffling in the Arabidopsis genome. The Plant Cell 12: 1093–1101. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types