Digging deeper into colonial palaeontological practices in modern day Mexico and Brazil
- PMID: 35291323
- PMCID: PMC8889171
- DOI: 10.1098/rsos.210898
Digging deeper into colonial palaeontological practices in modern day Mexico and Brazil
Abstract
Scientific practices stemming from colonialism, whereby middle- and low-income countries supply data for high-income countries and the contributions of local expertise are devalued, are still prevalent today in the field of palaeontology. In response to these unjust practices, countries such as Mexico and Brazil adopted protective laws and regulations during the twentieth century to preserve their palaeontological heritage. However, scientific colonialism is still reflected in many publications describing fossil specimens recovered from these countries. Here, we present examples of 'palaeontological colonialism' from publications on Jurassic-Cretaceous fossils from NE Mexico and NE Brazil spanning the last three decades. Common issues that we identified in these publications are the absence of both fieldwork and export permit declarations and the lack of local experts among authorships. In Mexico, access to many fossil specimens is restricted on account of these specimens being housed in private collections, whereas a high number of studies on Brazilian fossils are based on specimens illegally reposited in foreign collections, particularly in Germany and Japan. Finally, we outline and discuss the wider academic and social impacts of these research practices, and propose exhaustive recommendations to scientists, journals, museums, research institutions and government and funding agencies in order to overcome these practices.
Keywords: Latin America; illegal fossil trade; palaeontological heritage; parachute science; research ethics; scientific colonialism.
© 2022 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
We declare we have no competing interests.
Figures











References
-
- Adas M. 2008. Colonialism and science. In Encyclopaedia of the history of science, technology, and medicine in non-western cultures (ed. Selin H), pp. 604-609. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
-
- Aldrich R. 2009. Colonial museums in a postcolonial Europe. Afr. Black Diaspora: Int. J. 2, 137-156. ( 10.1080/17528630902981118) - DOI
-
- Andersen C, Clopot C, Ifversen J. 2020. Heritage and interculturality in EU science diplomacy. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 7, 1-8. ( 10.1057/s41599-020-00668-8) - DOI
-
- de Vos A. 2020. The Problem of ‘Colonial Science’. Scientific American, 1 July. See https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-problem-of-colonial-science/.
-
- North MA, Hastie WW, Hoyer L. 2020. Out of Africa: the underrepresentation of African authors in high-impact geoscience literature. Earth Sci. Rev. 208, 103262. ( 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103262) - DOI
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources