Dermoscopy use in primary care: a qualitative study with general practitioners
- PMID: 35291937
- PMCID: PMC8925058
- DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01653-7
Dermoscopy use in primary care: a qualitative study with general practitioners
Abstract
Background: Skin assessments constitute a significant proportion of consultations with family physicians (commonly called general practitioners or GPs in the UK), and referrals to hospital dermatology departments have risen significantly in recent years. Research has shown that dermoscopy use may help GPs to assess and triage skin lesions, including suspected skin cancers, more accurately. However, dermoscopy is used by a small minority of GPs in the UK. Previous questionnaire studies have aimed to establish in a limited way some perceptions of dermoscopy among GPs: this study aimed to explore more deeply the factors influencing the use of dermoscopy among GPs.
Methods: This was a qualitative interview study set in UK general practice. A purposive sample was taken of GPs who were established dermoscopy users, GPs who had recently adopted dermoscopy, and those who did not use dermoscopy. A total of twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted. Audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke).
Results: GPs' capability to use dermoscopy necessitated receiving adequate training, while previous dermatology experience and support from colleagues were also considered factors that enabled dermoscopy use. The impact of dermoscopy on patient consultations about skin complaints was generally considered to be positive, as was having an 'in-house' dermoscopy user within a GP practice to refer patients to. However, training in dermoscopy was not considered a priority for many GPs either due to other more pressing concerns within their practices or the perceived complexity of dermoscopy, alongside barriers such as equipment costs. Significant ethical concerns with posting patient photographs online for training and teaching purposes were also highlighted.
Conclusions: Both GPs who use dermoscopy, and those who do not, consider it to have an important role in improving skin assessments within primary care. However the need for adequate training in dermoscopy and dermatology more generally was highlighted as a key barrier to its wider use. The development of competency standards for the use of dermoscopy could allow the adequacy of training to be assessed and developed.
Keywords: Dermatology; Dermoscopy; Family Practice; General Practice; Melanoma; Qualitative research.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Since the conclusion of this study, F.M. has developed a course on skin lesion recognition in primary care that includes the use of dermoscopy. The other authors have no competing interests to declare.
Figures


Similar articles
-
General practitioners' perceptions of pharmacists working in general practice: a qualitative interview study.Fam Pract. 2023 Mar 28;40(2):377-386. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmac115. Fam Pract. 2023. PMID: 36242543 Free PMC article.
-
Dermoscopy use in UK primary care: a survey of GPs with a special interest in dermatology.J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Sep;33(9):1706-1712. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15614. Epub 2019 May 17. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019. PMID: 30977937 Free PMC article.
-
GPs' perceptions of teaching methods in shared decision-making training: a qualitative study.Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Mar 30;73(729):e310-e317. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0194. Print 2023 Apr. Br J Gen Pract. 2023. PMID: 36253111 Free PMC article.
-
Dermoscopy Use in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.Dermatol Pract Concept. 2019 Apr 30;9(2):98-104. doi: 10.5826/dpc.0902a04. eCollection 2019 Apr. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2019. PMID: 31106011 Free PMC article.
-
Using a mixed method to identify communication skills training priorities for Chinese general practitioners in diabetes care.BMC Prim Care. 2022 Oct 15;23(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01868-8. BMC Prim Care. 2022. PMID: 36243695 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Accuracy of ChatGPT in diagnosis and management of dermoscopic images.Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 Jan 7;317(1):184. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03729-z. Arch Dermatol Res. 2025. PMID: 39774990 No abstract available.
-
Effect of skin color on optical properties and the implications for medical optical technologies: a review.J Biomed Opt. 2024 Jan;29(1):010901. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.29.1.010901. Epub 2024 Jan 24. J Biomed Opt. 2024. PMID: 38269083 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Australian General practitioners' confidence in dermatology diagnosis and management: cross-sectional survey.Fam Pract. 2025 Jun 4;42(4):cmaf053. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaf053. Fam Pract. 2025. PMID: 40720207 Free PMC article.
-
Melanoma Detection by Non-Specialists: An Untapped Potential for Triage?Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 16;12(11):2821. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112821. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36428881 Free PMC article.
-
The Accuracy of Skin Cancer Detection Rates with the Implementation of Dermoscopy Among Dermatology Clinicians: A Scoping Review.J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2024 Sep-Oct;17(9-10 Suppl 1):S18-S27. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2024. PMID: 39386002 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Levell NJ, Jones SK, Bunker CB. Dermatology. In: Royal College of Physicians, editor. Consultant Physicians Working With Patients. Revised 5t. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2013. pp. 81–90.
-
- International Agency for Research on Cancer. Cancer Over Time [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 8]. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/overtime/en
-
- Public Health Agency. Skin Cancer Prevention Strategy And Action Plan 2011-21 [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2017 Nov 22]. Available from: https://www.health-ni.gov.uk/articles/skin-cancer-prevention
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources