Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 15;21(1):35.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01636-1.

Developing a tool for the measurement of social exclusion in healthcare settings

Patrick O'Donnell  1   2 , Ailish Hannigan  3   4 , Nuha Ibrahim  3 , Diarmuid O'Donovan  5 , Khalifa Elmusharaf  3   4
Affiliations

Developing a tool for the measurement of social exclusion in healthcare settings

Patrick O'Donnell et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Background: Social exclusion is a complex concept that is recognised as a key determinant of health. Many measurement tools developed looked at people from single excluded groups in isolation. We know from experience and literature that exclusion is often intersectional and multi-layered. Therefore, the aim of this research was to develop a social exclusion measurement tool for use in healthcare settings with individuals from any excluded group that would include questions to investigate socioeconomic elements and subjective experiences in their lives.

Methods: Inductive and deductive methods were used to develop the tool. Early drafts were tested with experts (both academic and experts by experience) and modified in line with feedback received. The tool was then piloted with people in the community, and this allowed us to assess the internal consistency and validity of the tool. Exploratory factor analysis was carried out as part of this evaluation.

Results: The measurement tool was initially evaluated by 17 academic and 'real world' experts. It was then piloted with seven experts by experience, two gatekeepers and two participants who were presumed not to be excluded, resulting in the development of the final tool. This was then tested with 276 participants (127 presumed excluded, 149 presumed not excluded). The socioeconomic characteristics of these participants were documented, and exploratory factor analysis was carried out on data relating to subjective items. A four-factor structure emerged comprising 22 items. Internal consistency of the factors was high, and their ability to discriminate between the two groups was notable.

Conclusions: A tool for measuring the social exclusion of individuals has been developed by engaging with people from a variety of excluded groups. Socioeconomic indicators were combined with subjective items. The input of experts by experience, academics and others was sought to enhance the tool. The tool was applied to two distinct samples, showing obvious differences both in the socioeconomic items, and the items included in the factor analysis. The potential use of this tool could have positive implications for people who are excluded.

Keywords: Health; Intersectionality; Scale development; Social exclusion; Tool evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lenoir R. Les Exclus: Un Francais sur Dix. Paris: Editions du Seuil; 1974.
    1. United Nations . Leaving No One Behind: The Imperative of Inclusive Development. Report on the World Social Situation 2016. New York: United Nations; 2016.
    1. Das MB, Evans TG, Palu T, Wilson D. Social Inclusion: What does it mean for health policy and practice? - Health, Nutrition and Population Discussion Paper. Washington DC: World Bank; 2017.
    1. Popay J, Escorel S, Hernández M, Johnston H, Mathieson J, Rispel L. Understanding and tackling social exclusion. Final report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health from the Social Exclusion Knowledge Network. World Health Organization. 2008 https://www.who.int/social_determinants/knowledge_networks/final_reports... Accessed 01 Mar 2016.
    1. Piachaud D, Bennett F, Nazroo J, Popay J. Task Group Submission to the Marmot Review. 2009. Report of Task Group 9: Social Inclusion and Social Mobility.