PEER simplified chronic pain guideline: Management of chronic low back, osteoarthritic, and neuropathic pain in primary care
- PMID: 35292455
- PMCID: PMC9833192
- DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6803179
PEER simplified chronic pain guideline: Management of chronic low back, osteoarthritic, and neuropathic pain in primary care
Abstract
Objective: To develop a clinical practice guideline to support the management of chronic pain, including low back, osteoarthritic, and neuropathic pain in primary care.
Methods: The guideline was developed with an emphasis on best available evidence and shared decision-making principles. Ten health professionals (4 generalist family physicians, 1 pain management-focused family physician, 1 anesthesiologist, 1 physical therapist, 1 pharmacist, 1 nurse practitioner, and 1 psychologist), a patient representative, and a nonvoting pharmacist and guideline methodologist comprised the Guideline Committee. Member selection was based on profession, practice setting, and lack of financial conflicts of interest. The guideline process was iterative in identification of key questions, evidence review, and development of guideline recommendations. Three systematic reviews, including a total of 285 randomized controlled trials, were completed. Randomized controlled trials were included only if they reported a responder analysis (eg, how many patients achieved a 30% or greater reduction in pain). The committee directed an Evidence Team (composed of evidence experts) to address an additional 11 complementary questions. Key recommendations were derived through committee consensus. The guideline and shared decision-making tools underwent extensive review by clinicians and patients before publication.
Recommendations: Physical activity is recommended as the foundation for managing osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain; evidence of benefit is unclear for neuropathic pain. Cognitive-behavioural therapy or mindfulness-based stress reduction are also suggested as options for managing chronic pain. Treatments for which there is clear, unclear, or no benefit are outlined for each condition. Treatments for which harms likely outweigh benefits for all or most conditions studied include opioids and cannabinoids.
Conclusion: This guideline for the management of chronic pain, including osteoarthritis, low back pain, and neuropathic pain, highlights best available evidence including both benefits and harms for a number of treatment interventions. A strong recommendation for exercise as the primary treatment for chronic osteoarthritic and low back pain is made based on demonstrated long-term evidence of benefit. This information is intended to assist with, not dictate, shared decision making with patients.
Copyright© 2022 the College of Family Physicians of Canada.
Figures
Comment in
-
Excellent chronic pain guideline.Can Fam Physician. 2022 May;68(5):322. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6805322. Can Fam Physician. 2022. PMID: 35552228 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- The Canadian Pain Task Force . An action plan for pain in Canada. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada; 2021. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/hc-sc/documents/corporate/about-health.... Accessed 2021 Sep 13.
-
- Ballantyne JC, Sullivan MD. Intensity of chronic pain—the wrong metric? N Engl J Med 2015;373(22):2098-9. - PubMed
-
- Pain Management Best Practices Inter-Agency Task Force . Pain management best practices. Inter-Agency Task Force report. Updates, gaps, inconsistencies, and recommendations. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2019. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/pain-mgmt-best-practices-draft-f.... Accessed 2021 Sep 26.
-
- Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care, and Education . Relieving pain in America: a blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical