Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Mar 15;12(3):e051310.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051310.

Food handling practice and associated factors among food handlers in public food establishments of Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Food handling practice and associated factors among food handlers in public food establishments of Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Maru Meseret Tadele et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Food handlers are individuals who are involved in food preparation, storage or service of food in a food facility. Unless they keep their personal hygiene, they are highly responsible for contaminating food or transmitting microbes to consumers. Thus, the main aim of this review was to pool the level of good food handling practice among food handlers working in public food establishments in Ethiopia.

Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tool.

Data sources: PubMed, Google Scholar and Advanced Google were searched up to the end of February 2021.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Publication status, publication language, type of study participants and the type of article were used to screen the article.

Data extraction and study quality assessment: All reviewers collected data independently and merged them together. A tool called the JBI Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument was used to assess the quality of each research article. The assessment was performed by two reviewers.

Result: A total of 16 research articles were included in the review. The pooled level of good food handling practice was 50.72% with 95% CI (43.84% to 57.6%). Training (adjusted OR (AOR)=3.4, 95% CI (2.33 to 4.95)), attitude (AOR=3.62, 95% CI (2.23 to 5.85)) and medical check-up (AOR=5.12, 95% CI (2.93 to 8.95)) were identified as factors affecting good food handling practice with 95% CI at p<0.05.

Conclusion: The level of good food handling practice among food handlers working in public food establishments of Ethiopia was very low compared with literature, and variables such as food handler training, attitude towards good food handling practice and the existence of regular medical check-ups were factors affecting good food handling practice. Provision of training that could change the attitude and regular medical check-ups for food handlers has to be in place.

Keywords: Ethiopia; Food handlers; Food handling; Public food establishment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow chart diagram describing the selection of studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot showing the pooled level of good food handling practice (FHP) among food handlers working in public food establishments of Ethiopia, 2021.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Subgroup analysis of good food handling practice (FHP) by year of study.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Subgroup analysis of good food handling practice (FHP) by size of study participants.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Funnel plot, in which the vertical line indicates the effect size whereas the diagonal line indicates the precision of individual studies with 95% confidence limit.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot of the adjusted ORs (AORs) with corresponding 95% CIs of studies on the association of training against good food handling practice.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Forest plot of the adjusted ORs (AORs) with corresponding 95% CIs of studies on the association of attitude against good food handling practice.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Forest plot of the adjusted ORs (AORs) with corresponding 95% CIs of studies on the association of medical check-up against good food handling practice.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. FDRE: Public Health Proclamation . No. 200/2000: Federal Negarit Gazeta - No.28 2000;1275.
    1. WHO . The role of food safety in health and development; report of a joint FAO/WHO expert Committee on food Safet. Geneva: WHO Technical Report Series 705, 1984. - PubMed
    1. Boot MT, Cairncross S. Actions speak the. Hague, Netherlands: Study of Hygiene Behavior in Water and Sanitation Projects, IRC, 1993.
    1. WHO . World Health organization estimates of the global burden of foodborne diseases: foodborne disease burden epidemiology reference group. WHO, 2015.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition . Managing food safety: a manual for the voluntary use of HACCP principles for operators of food service and retail establishments, 2006.

LinkOut - more resources