Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;3(3):236-244.
doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.33.BJO-2021-0198.R1.

Return to work and sport after a humeral shaft fracture

Affiliations

Return to work and sport after a humeral shaft fracture

William M Oliver et al. Bone Jt Open. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Aims: The primary aim of this study was to determine the rates of return to work (RTW) and sport (RTS) following a humeral shaft fracture. The secondary aim was to identify factors independently associated with failure to RTW or RTS.

Methods: From 2008 to 2017, all patients with a humeral diaphyseal fracture were retrospectively identified. Patient demographics and injury characteristics were recorded. Details of pre-injury employment, sporting participation, and levels of return post-injury were obtained via postal questionnaire. The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Scale was used to quantify physical activity among active patients. Regression was used to determine factors independently associated with failure to RTW or RTS.

Results: The Work Group comprised 177 patients in employment prior to injury (mean age 47 years (17 to 78); 51% female (n = 90)). Mean follow-up was 5.8 years (1.3 to 11). Overall, 85% (n = 151) returned to work at a mean of 14 weeks post-injury (0 to 104), but only 60% (n = 106) returned full-time to their previous employment. Proximal-third fractures (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2 to 14.2); p = 0.029) were independently associated with failure to RTW. The Sport Group comprised 182 patients involved in sport prior to injury (mean age 52 years (18 to 85); 57% female (n = 104)). Mean follow-up was 5.4 years (1.3 to 11). The mean UCLA score reduced from 6.9 (95% CI 6.6 to 7.2) before injury to 6.1 (95% CI 5.8 to 6.4) post-injury (p < 0.001). There were 89% (n = 162) who returned to sport: 8% (n = 14) within three months, 34% (n = 62) within six months, and 70% (n = 127) within one year. Age ≥ 60 years was independently associated with failure to RTS (aOR 3.0 (95% CI 1.1 to 8.2); p = 0.036). No other factors were independently associated with failure to RTW or RTS.

Conclusion: Most patients successfully return to work and sport following a humeral shaft fracture, albeit at a lower level of physical activity. Patients aged ≥ 60 yrs and those with proximal-third diaphyseal fractures are at increased risk of failing to return to activity. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(3):236-244.

Keywords: Employment; Fischer's exact test; Fracture; Humeral diaphysis; Humeral shaft; Mann-Whitney U test; Nonunion; Orthopaedic Trauma; Physical activity; Sport; Work; chi-squared test; diaphyseal fractures; humeral diaphyseal fractures; humeral shaft fractures; medical comorbidities; nonoperative management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Return to employment following a humeral diaphyseal fracture (n = 177).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pre- and post-injury activity level for patients with a humeral diaphyseal fracture, according to the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Scale (n = 182).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Time of return to sport following a humeral diaphyseal fracture (n = 182).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the relationship between patient age at humeral diaphyseal fracture and return to sport; area under curve 0.665 (95% confidence interval 0.523 to 0.808); p = 0.016.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691–697. 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oliver WM, Searle HKC, ZH N, Wickramasinghe NRL, Molyneux SG, White TO. Fractures of the proximal- and middle-thirds of the humeral shaft should be considered as fragility fractures: an epidemiological study of 900 consecutive injuries. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(11):1475–1483. - PubMed
    1. Sarmiento A, Kinman PB, Galvin EG, Schmitt RH, Phillips JG. Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59-A(5):596–601. 10.2106/00004623-197759050-00004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huttunen TT, Kannus P, Lepola V, Pihlajamäki H, Mattila VM. Surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures: a register-based study in Finland between 1987 and 2009. Injury. 2012;43(10):1704–1708. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schoch BS, Padegimas EM, Maltenfort M, Krieg J, Namdari S. Humeral shaft fractures: national trends in management. J Orthop Traumatol. 2017;18(3):259–263. doi:10.1007/s10195-017-0459-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed