Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the Pediatric Research Gap Delphi Survey
- PMID: 35293373
- DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003610
Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the Pediatric Research Gap Delphi Survey
Abstract
Background: In 2016, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine trauma report recommended a National Trauma Research Action Plan to "strengthen trauma research and ensure that the resources available for this research are commensurate with the importance of injury and the potential for improvement in patient outcomes." With a contract from the Department of Defense, the Coalition for National Trauma Research created 11 expert panels to address this recommendation, with the goal of developing a comprehensive research agenda, spanning the continuum of trauma and burn care. This report outlines the work of the group focused on pediatric trauma.
Methods: Experts in pediatric trauma clinical care and research were recruited to identify gaps in current clinical pediatric trauma research, generate research questions, and establish the priority of these questions using a consensus-driven Delphi survey approach. Using successive surveys, participants were asked to rank the priority of each research question on a 9-point Likert scale categorized to represent priority. Consensus was defined as >60% agreement within the priority category. Priority questions were coded based on a dictionary of 118 National Trauma Research Action Plan taxonomy concepts in 9 categories to support comparative analysis across all panels.
Results: Thirty-seven subject matter experts generated 625 questions. A total of 493 questions (79%) reached consensus on priority level. Of those reaching consensus, 159 (32%) were high, 325 (66%) were medium, and 9 (2%) were low priority. The highest priority research questions related to surgical interventions for traumatic brain injury (intracranial pressure monitoring and craniotomy); the second highest priority was hemorrhagic shock. The prehospital setting was the highest priority phase of care.
Conclusion: This diverse panel of experts determined that most significant pediatric trauma research gaps were in traumatic brain injury, hemorrhagic shock, and the prehospital phase of care. These research domains should be top priorities for funding agencies.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic / Care Management; Level IV.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. 10 Leading Causes of Death by Age Group, United States — 2018. Updated June 24, 2020. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/LeadingCauses_images.html . Accessed November 9, 2021.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. 2019, United States All Injury Deaths and Rates Per 100,000. Updated February 20, 2020. Available at: https://wisqars.cdc.gov/fatal-reports . Accessed November 9, 2021.
-
- Avraham JB, Bhandari M, Frangos SG, Levine DA, Tunik MG, DiMaggio CJ. Epidemiology of paediatric trauma presenting to US emergency departments: 2006–2012. Inj Prev . 2019;25:136–143.
-
- Dowd B, McKenney M, Boneva D, Elkbuli A. Disparities in National Institute of Health trauma research funding: the search for sufficient funding opportunities. Medicine (Baltimore) . 2020;99:e19027.
-
- Cunningham RM, Ranney ML, Goldstick JE, Kamat SV, Roche JS, Carter PM. Federal funding for research on the leading causes of death among children and adolescents. Health Aff (Millwood) . 2019;38:1653–1661.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
