Relationship between Presence of Third Molars and Prevalence of Periodontal Pathology of Adjacent Second Molars: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the mean prevalence of periodontal pathology of adjacent second molars (A-M2s) to third molars (M3s) and identify related confounding factors.

Methods: Studies published before August 2020 were systematically searched in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and MEDLINE databases. We included cross-sectional studies that evaluated the periodontal pathology of A-M2s based on clinical or radiographic examinations at the molar level. Studies employing similar periodontal parameters were pooled. Clinical attachment loss ≥ 3 mm, alveolar bone loss ≥ 3 mm or ≥ 20% root length were defined as early periodontal defects, and at least one site with probing depth ≥ 5 mm was considered as deep periodontal pockets around A-M2s in the data synthesis.

Results: Nine studies (14,749 M3s) were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. On average, 19% of A-M2s showed distal early periodontal defects with the presence of M3s (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 9%-35%). Subgroup analyses suggested the prevalence was 32% (95% CI 16%-54%) in the mandible, and the prevalence was higher with nonimpacted M3s (25%, 95% CI 12%-47%) than with impacted M3s (19%, 95% CI 10%-35%). Additionally, the pooled prevalence for deep periodontal pockets around A-M2s was 52% (95% CI 39%-64%). Subgroup analyses suggested the prevalence was higher in the mandible (62%, 95% CI 45%-76%) than in the maxilla (43%, 95% CI 31%-56%), and for nonimpacted M3s the prevalence reached 50% (95% CI 36%-64%).

Conclusion: The presence of M3s, especially mandibular and nonimpacted M3s, negatively affects the periodontal status of A-M2s.

Keywords: meta-analysis; periodontal pathology; prevalence; second molars; third molars.