Assessment of the Readability of Web-Based Patient Education Material From Major Canadian Pediatric Associations: Cross-sectional Study
- PMID: 35293875
- PMCID: PMC8968558
- DOI: 10.2196/31820
Assessment of the Readability of Web-Based Patient Education Material From Major Canadian Pediatric Associations: Cross-sectional Study
Abstract
Background: Web-based patient education materials (PEMs) are frequently written above the recommended reading level in North America. Poor PEM readability limits the accessibility of medical information for individuals with average literacy levels or lower. Pediatric hospital and association websites have not only been shown to be a preferred source of information among caregivers but have also become a necessity during the COVID-19 pandemic. The readability of Canadian pediatric association websites has not yet been assessed.
Objective: The aim of this study is to determine if the content of PEMs from Canadian pediatric associations is written at a reading level that the majority of Canadians can understand.
Methods: A total of 258 PEMs were extracted from 10 Canadian pediatric associations and evaluated for their reading level using 10 validated readability scales. The PEMs underwent a difficult word analysis and comparisons between PEMs from different associations were conducted.
Results: Web-based PEMs were identified from 3 pediatric association websites, where the reading level (calculated as a grade level) was found to be an average of 8.8 (SD 1.8) for the Caring for Kids website, 9.5 (SD 2.2) for the Pediatric Endocrine Group website, and 13.1 (SD 2.1) for the Atlantic Pediatric Society website. The difficult word analysis identified that 19.9% (SD 6.6%) of words were unfamiliar, with 13.3% (SD 5.3%) and 31.9% (SD 6.1%) of words being considered complex (≥3 syllables) and long (≥6 letters), respectively.
Conclusions: The web-based PEMs were found to be written above the recommended seventh-grade reading level for Canadians. Consideration should be made to create PEMs at an appropriate reading level for both patients and their caregivers to encourage health literacy and ultimately promote preventative health behaviors and improve child health outcomes.
Keywords: accessibility; health literacy; online health information; patient education; pediatrics.
©Alice Man, Courtney van Ballegooie. Originally published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting (https://pediatrics.jmir.org), 16.03.2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Assessment of online patient education material for eye cancers: A cross-sectional study.PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Oct 16;3(10):e0001967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001967. eCollection 2023. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37844025 Free PMC article.
-
Readability assessment of online gynecologic oncology patient education materials from major governmental, non-profit and pharmaceutical organizations.Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;154(3):616-621. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.026. Epub 2019 Jul 16. Gynecol Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31324452
-
Assessment of the Readability of Online Patient Education Material from Major Geriatric Associations.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Apr;69(4):1051-1056. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16960. Epub 2020 Nov 25. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021. PMID: 33236778
-
Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7):1392-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.032. Epub 2023 Jan 27. J Arthroplasty. 2023. PMID: 36716898
-
Quality, Readability, and Suitability of Hearing Health-Related Materials: A Descriptive Review.Am J Audiol. 2020 Sep 3;29(3):513-527. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-19-00040. Epub 2020 Jun 18. Am J Audiol. 2020. PMID: 32551926 Review.
Cited by
-
Empowering patients: how accurate and readable are large language models in renal cancer education.Front Oncol. 2024 Sep 26;14:1457516. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1457516. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39391252 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the Functional Accessibility, Actionability, and Quality of Patient Education Materials from Canadian Cancer Agencies.Curr Oncol. 2023 Jan 19;30(2):1439-1449. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30020110. Curr Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36826071 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of electronic patient education materials for adolescent bariatric surgery candidates: An environment scan.PEC Innov. 2023 Feb 24;2:100143. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100143. eCollection 2023 Dec. PEC Innov. 2023. PMID: 37214509 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in Health Education Literacy After Structured Web-Based Education Versus Self-Directed Online Information Seeking in Patients Undergoing Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery: Nonrandomized, Controlled Study.JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 25;9:e65114. doi: 10.2196/65114. JMIR Form Res. 2025. PMID: 40135326 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of online patient education material for eye cancers: A cross-sectional study.PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Oct 16;3(10):e0001967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001967. eCollection 2023. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37844025 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rothrock S, Rothrock A, Swetland S, Pagane M, Isaak S, Romney J, Chavez V, Chavez S. Quality, trustworthiness, readability, and accuracy of medical information regarding common pediatric emergency medicine-related complaints on the web. J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;57(4):469–477. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.06.043. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0736-4679(19)30560-8 S0736-4679(19)30560-8 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cocco AM, Zordan R, Taylor DM, Weiland TJ, Dilley SJ, Kant J, Dombagolla M, Hendarto A, Lai F, Hutton J. Dr Google in the ED: searching for online health information by adult emergency department patients. Med J Aust. 2018 Oct 15;209(8):342–347. doi: 10.5694/mja17.00889.10.5694/mja17.00889 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Diaz JA, Griffith RA, Ng JJ, Reinert SE, Friedmann PD, Moulton AW. Patients' use of the internet for medical information. J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Mar;17(3):180–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10603.x. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/openurl?genre=article&sid=nlm:pu... jgi10603 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Farrell TW, Francis L, Brown T, Ferrante LE, Widera E, Rhodes R, Rosen T, Hwang U, Witt LJ, Thothala N, Liu SW, Vitale CA, Braun UK, Stephens C, Saliba D. Rationing limited healthcare resources in the COVID-19 era and beyond: ethical considerations regarding older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):1143–1149. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16539. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32374466 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials