Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Aug;24(8):556-563.
doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0025. Epub 2022 Apr 13.

Tele-Ophthalmology Versus Face-to-Face Retinal Consultation for Assessment of Diabetic Retinopathy in Diabetes Care Centers in India: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Tele-Ophthalmology Versus Face-to-Face Retinal Consultation for Assessment of Diabetic Retinopathy in Diabetes Care Centers in India: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

Ramachandran Rajalakshmi et al. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of tele-ophthalmology (TO) versus face-to-face screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in diabetes care centers (DCC) across India. Methods: This is an observational, multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study of DR screening in individuals with diabetes performed across 35 branches of a chain of DCC in 20 cities in India over 1 year. In 30 DCC, DR screening was performed by TO, where retinal images obtained using Fundus on Phone camera were uploaded through the telemedicine network for centralized DR grading by eight retina specialists. In five DCC, DR screening was performed by fundus examination (FE) by the same retina specialists. The rate of detection of sight-threatening DR (STDR) (defined as the presence of proliferative DR and/or diabetic macular edema) through the two modes was compared. Results: A total of 58,612 individuals were screened for DR from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018: 25,316 by TO and 33,296 by FE. The mean age and mean duration of diabetes of the individuals with diabetes screened by TO was 55.8 ± 11.2 years and 9.5 ± 7.3 years; and in individuals screened by FE, it was 57.5 ± 11.6 years and 11.5 ± 8.0 years respectively. The mean glycated hemoglobin was 8.8% ± 2.1% and 8.5% ± 1.9% in the two groups, respectively. Any DR was detected in 31.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 31.0-32.3) by tele-screening and in 38.5% (95% CI: 37.9-39.0) by FE, whereas STDR was detected in 7.3% (95% CI: 7.0-7.7) by TO and in 10.5% (95% CI: 10.2-10.9) by FE. Overall, 11.4% individuals with diabetes in the TO group, including 4.1% with ungradable images, were advised referral to retina specialists for further management. Conclusion: Screening for DR at DCC using TO is feasible and effective for STDR detection in India and may be adopted throughout India.

Keywords: Diabetes care centers; Diabetic retinopathy screening; India; Retinal imaging; Sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy; Teleophthalmology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
DR detection by tele-ophthalmology and by fundus examination at diabetes care centers across India. DR, diabetic retinopathy. Color images are available online.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Frequency distribution of any DR through the two models of DR screening based on duration of diabetes. Color images are available online.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Diabetes Collaborators: The increasing burden of diabetes and variations among the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2016. Lancet Glob Health 2018;6:e1352–e1362. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rajalakshmi R, Shanthi Rani CS, Venkatesan U, et al. : Correlation between markers of renal function and sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal study in an Indian clinic population. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2020;8:e001325. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leasher JL, Bourne RR, Flaxman SR, et al. : Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by diabetic retinopathy: a meta-analysis from 1990 to 2010. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1643–1649. - PubMed
    1. Wong TY, Sun J, Kawasaki R, et al. : Guidelines on diabetic eye care: the international council of ophthalmology recommendations for screening, follow-up, referral, and treatment based on resource settings. Ophthalmology 2018;125:1608–1622. - PubMed
    1. Rajalakshmi R, Prathiba V, Rani PK, et al. : Various models for diabetic retinopathy screening that can be applied to India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2021;69:2951–2958. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types