Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 2;28(15):3277-3286.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0985.

Three-Year Follow-Up and Response-Survival Relationship of Nivolumab in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ATTRACTION-3)

Affiliations

Three-Year Follow-Up and Response-Survival Relationship of Nivolumab in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ATTRACTION-3)

Morihito Okada et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: Limited long-term data are available on immune checkpoint inhibitor use in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We report 3-year follow-up data from our study of nivolumab versus chemotherapy (paclitaxel or docetaxel) in patients with previously treated ESCC.

Patients and methods: ATTRACTION-3 was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial. Overall survival (OS), time from randomization to death from any cause, was the primary endpoint. An exploratory subanalysis assessed OS according to the best overall response (BOR) with and without landmark at 4 months.

Results: Of the enrolled patients, 210 received nivolumab and 209 received chemotherapy. With a minimum follow-up of 36.0 months, OS was longer in the nivolumab versus the chemotherapy group (median, 10.9 vs. 8.5 months; HR, 0.79; P = 0.0264), with 3-year OS rates of 15.3% and 8.7%, respectively. The median OS was longer with nivolumab versus chemotherapy irrespective of the BOR (complete response/partial response: 19.9 vs. 15.4 months; stable disease: 17.4 vs. 8.8 months; and progressive disease: 7.6 vs. 4.2 months). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were reported in 40 patients (19.1%) in the nivolumab group and 133 patients (63.9%) in the chemotherapy group.

Conclusions: Nivolumab as second-line therapy demonstrated clinically meaningful long-term improvement in OS compared with chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced ESCC. The OS was consistently improved in the nivolumab group compared with the chemotherapy group regardless of BOR. Nivolumab was well tolerated over the 3-year follow-up. See related commentary by Yoon et al., p. 3173.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival (A) andprogression-free survival (B).
Figure 1.
Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival (A) and progression-free survival (B).
Figure 2. Overall survival analysis by best overall response. Kaplan–Meier curves show OS by BOR in patients with complete response or partial response (A), in patients with SD (B), and in patients with progressive disease (C).
Figure 2.
Overall survival analysis by best overall response. Kaplan–Meier curves show OS by BOR in patients with CR or PR (A), in patients with SD (B), and in patients with PD (C).
Figure 3. Treatment and outcomes of 3-year survivors in nivolumab group. Swimmer plot represent treatment-free period, discontinuations, BOR, and subsequent therapy of 3-year survivors (n = 31) in the nivolumab group. CDDP, cisplatin; CR, complete response; DOX, docetaxel; 5-FU, 5-Fluorouracil; L-OHP, oxaliplatin; NE, not evaluable; Nivo, Nivolumab; PTX, paclitaxel.
Figure 3.
Treatment and outcomes of 3-year survivors in nivolumab group. Swimmer plot represents treatment-free period, discontinuations, BOR, and subsequent therapy of 3-year survivors (n = 31) in the nivolumab group. CDDP, cisplatin; CR, complete response; DOX, docetaxel; 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; L-OHP, oxaliplatin; NE, not evaluable; Nivo, nivolumab; PTX, paclitaxel.
Figure 4. Emergence of select TRAEs over time in the nivolumab group. The number of patients exhibiting the first event in a category within a certain time period is depicted.
Figure 4.
Emergence of select TRAEs over time in the nivolumab group. The number of patients exhibiting the first event in a category within a certain time period is depicted.

Comment in

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021. - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society. Survival rates for esophageal cancer by stage. Available from: https://cancerstatisticscenter.cancer.org/#!/statistics.
    1. Cancer Information Service. Cancer statistics in Japan—survival. Available from: https://ganjoho.jp/en/professional/statistics/table_download.html.
    1. Muro K, Hamaguchi T, Ohtsu A, Boku N, Chin K, Hyodo I, et al. . A phase II study of single-agent docetaxel in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol 2004;15:955–9. - PubMed
    1. Kato K, Tahara M, Hironaka S, Muro K, Takiuchi H, Hamamoto Y, et al. . A phase II study of paclitaxel by weekly 1-h infusion for advanced or recurrent esophageal cancer in patients who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2010;67:1265–72. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms