Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;56(3):492-500.
doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00386-0. Epub 2022 Mar 16.

The Predictive Individual Effect for Survival Data

Affiliations

The Predictive Individual Effect for Survival Data

Beat Neuenschwander et al. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 May.

Abstract

Background: The call for patient-focused drug development is loud and clear, as expressed in the twenty-first Century Cures Act and in recent guidelines and initiatives of regulatory agencies. Among the factors contributing to modernized drug development and improved health-care activities are easily interpretable measures of clinical benefit. In addition, special care is needed for cancer trials with time-to-event endpoints if the treatment effect is not constant over time.

Objective: To quantify the potential clinical survival benefit for a new patient, would he/she be treated with the test or control treatment.

Methods: We propose the predictive individual effect which is a patient-centric and tangible measure of clinical benefit under a wide variety of scenarios. It can be obtained by standard predictive calculations under a rank preservation assumption that has been used previously in trials with treatment switching.

Results: We discuss four recent Oncology trials that cover situations with proportional as well as non-proportional hazards (delayed treatment effect or crossing of survival curves). It is shown that the predictive individual effect offers valuable insights beyond p-values, estimates of hazard ratios or differences in median survival.

Conclusion: Compared to standard statistical measures, the predictive individual effect is a direct, easily interpretable measure of clinical benefit. It facilitates communication among clinicians, patients, and other parties and should therefore be considered in addition to standard statistical results.

Keywords: Bayesian predictive inference; Non-proportional hazards; Patient-centric measure; Rank preservation; Survival gain; Time-to-event endpoint.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. US House of Representatives. 21st Century Cures Act, 2015. https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44071.pdf. Accessed 1 Nov 2016.
    1. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, et al. Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(19):1803–13. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Ribas A, Kefford R, Marshall MA, et al. Phase I randomized clinical trial comparing tremelimumab with standard-of-care chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(5):616–22. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Wolchok JD, Neyns B, Linette G, et al. Ipilimumab monotherapy in patients with pretreated advanced melanoma: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 2, dose-ranging study. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(2):155–64.
    1. Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(1):23–34. - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources