Risk stratifying gastric ulcers: development and validation of a scoring system
- PMID: 35295750
- PMCID: PMC8862450
- DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2020-101759
Risk stratifying gastric ulcers: development and validation of a scoring system
Abstract
Objective: Debate is ongoing regarding the need for universal endoscopic follow-up to ensure gastric ulcer healing. We aimed to assess the value of follow-up oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopies (OGDs) for gastric ulcer healing and stratify patients according to risk of malignancy by developing a risk score.
Design/method: All patients in National Health Service (NHS) Lothian with an index OGD and a diagnosis of gastric ulcer between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018 were identified. Data were analysed with logistic regression to identify factors significantly associated with a diagnosis of cancer; a risk score was derived and externally validated.
Results: 778 patients were identified and 60.3% (469/778) of patients had a follow-up OGD. 8.6% (66/778) of patients were diagnosed with cancer. No cases of cancer were found on follow-up OGD of a benign appearing ulcer with negative biopsies. Macroscopic suspicion of malignancy was present at index OGD in 100% (3/3) of those diagnosed with cancer on subsequent OGDs. Older age (p=0.014), increased ulcer size (p<0.001) and non-antral location (p=0.030) were significantly associated with malignancy. A risk score (area under the curve (AUC) 0.868, p<0.001, minimum score=0, maximum score=6) was derived from these variables. 78.0% of patients with malignant ulcers scored ≥3, only 15.8% with benign ulcers scored ≥3 (negative predictive value (NPV) 97.4%). External validation yielded an AUC of 0.862 (p<0.001) and NPV of 98.6%; 84.0% of those with malignant ulcers scored ≥3.
Conclusion: Ulcers with a combination of macroscopically benign appearances, at least six negative biopsies and a low risk score do not necessarily need endoscopic follow-up.
Keywords: gastric and duodenal ulcers; gastrointesinal endoscopy; gastrointestinal cancer.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures



References
-
- Beg S, Ragunath K, Wyman A, et al. . Quality Standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of gastroenterology (BSG) and association of upper gastrointestinal surgeons of great britain and ireland (AUGIS). Gut 2017;66:1886–99. 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314109 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- NICE Pathway . Managing peptic ulcer disease in adults; 2020.
-
- Public Health Scotland . Stomach cancer statistics, 2020. Available: https://www.isdscotland.org/Health-Topics/Cancer/Cancer-Statistics/Stomach/ [Accessed 11 Aug 2020].
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources