Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 25;13(2):104-110.
doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2020-101714. eCollection 2022.

Insight from patients and healthcare professionals on the implementation of virtual clinics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Aditi Kumar  1 , Mohammed Nabil Quraishi  2 , Shanika de Silva  3 , Nigel John Trudgill  4 , Helen Steed  1   5 , Matthew James Brookes  1   6 , Rachel Cooney  2
Affiliations

Insight from patients and healthcare professionals on the implementation of virtual clinics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Aditi Kumar et al. Frontline Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Introduction: During COVID-19, the management of outpatient inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) changed from face-to-face (F2F) to telephone and video consultations across the UK. We surveyed patients with IBD and IBD healthcare professionals (HCPs) to evaluate the impact of this abrupt transition on patient and HCP satisfaction outcomes, including the barriers and enablers of this service.

Methods: Patient satisfaction surveys were sent to patients who had a telephone consultation from May to July 2020. A second survey was sent to IBD HCPs across the UK. Questions from both surveys consisted of a mixture of multiple-choice options, ranking answers as well as short-answer questions.

Results: 210 patients and 114 HCPs completed the survey. During COVID-19, there was a significantly greater use of telephone, video or a mixture of consultation. F2F consultations were consistently preferred by patients, with 50% of patients indicating they did not want the option of for video consultations. Patients were more likely to prefer a telephone consultation if they were stable and needed routine review. Significantly fewer HCPs (5.3%) intend to use F2F consultations alone, preferring the use of telephone (20.2%) or combinations of telephone/F2F (22.8%), telephone/video (4.4%) or combination of all three consultation types (34.2%). 63% indicated they intend to incorporate video consultations in the future.

Conclusion: Telephone and video consultations need to be balanced proportionately with F2F clinics to achieve both patient and HCP satisfaction. Further research needs to be done to explore the use of video medicine in patients with IBD.

Keywords: COVID-19; inflammatory bowel disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: SdS has received speaker fees/consultancy from Abbvie, Pfizer, Takeda, Dr Falk, Predictimmune and Janssen; and conference travel from Pfizer, Tillots, Predictimmune, Abbvie, Dr Falk and Janssen. NJT has received research support from Astra Zeneca, Dr Falk, MSD and Pfizer. MJB has received grants and travel expenses from Vifor International and Tillots Pharma, outside of the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Patients’ and (B) healthcare professionals’ response to how they compared their telephone consultation with an F2F consultation. F2F: face-to-face.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Patients ranked their top three preferences for consultations in the future and (B) healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) intentions for consultations in the future. F2F, face-to-face.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Overall experiences of healthcare professionals with telephone consultations and (B) the difficulties encountered by healthcare professionals with telephone consultations. F2F, face-to-face; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

  • Exploring the Experiences of Virtual Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care in Saskatchewan.
    Rohatinsky N, Russell B, Peña-Sánchez JN, Boklaschuk S, Bhasin S, Fowler S, Guzowski T, Wicks K, Wicks M. Rohatinsky N, et al. Can J Nurs Res. 2024 Mar;56(1):95-108. doi: 10.1177/08445621231219299. Epub 2023 Dec 7. Can J Nurs Res. 2024. PMID: 38062657 Free PMC article.
  • Gastroenterology 2022: Groundhog Day.
    Tavabie OD, Clough J, Kumar A. Tavabie OD, et al. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2022 Feb 19;13(4):349-351. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102111. eCollection 2022. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 35722604 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Sandberg K, Yarger E, Saeed S. Updates in diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2020;50:100785. 10.1016/j.cppeds.2020.100785 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robinson A, Thompson DG, Wilkin D, et al. . Guided self-management and patient-directed follow-up of ulcerative colitis: a randomised trial. Lancet 2001;358:976–81. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06105-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hunter J, Claridge A, James S, et al. . Improving outpatient services: the Southampton IBD virtual clinic. Frontline Gastroenterol 2012;3:76–80. 10.1136/flgastro-2012-100123 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenhalgh T, Vijayaraghavan S, Wherton J, et al. . Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (vocal) study. BMJ Open 2016;6:e009388. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009388 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fofaria RK, Barber S, Adeleke Y, et al. . Stratification of inflammatory bowel disease outpatients by disease activity and risk of complications to guide out-of-hospital monitoring: a patient-centred quality improvement project. BMJ Open Qual 2019;8:e000546. 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000546 - DOI - PMC - PubMed