Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 28:150:e63.
doi: 10.1017/S0950268822000383.

Faecal carriage of Clostridioides difficile is low among veterinary healthcare workers in the Netherlands

Affiliations

Faecal carriage of Clostridioides difficile is low among veterinary healthcare workers in the Netherlands

Anouk P Meijs et al. Epidemiol Infect. .

Abstract

Veterinary healthcare workers are in close contact with many different animals and might be at an increased risk of acquiring Clostridioides difficile. In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the prevalence and risk factors of C. difficile carriage in Dutch veterinary healthcare workers. Participants provided a faecal sample and filled out a questionnaire covering potential risk factors for C. difficile carriage. C. difficile culture positive isolates were polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotyped and the presence of toxin genes tcdA, tcdB and cdtA/cdtB was determined. Eleven of 482 [2.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-4.0] veterinary healthcare workers were carriers of C. difficile. Three persons carried C. difficile ribotype 078 (0.6%; 95% CI 0.2-1.8). Risk factors for carriage were health/medication and hygiene related, including poor hand hygiene after patient (animal) contact, and did not include occupational contact with certain animal species. In conclusion, the prevalence of C. difficile carriage in veterinary healthcare workers was low and no indications were found that working in veterinary care is a risk for C. difficile carriage.

Keywords: Clostridioides difficile; Clostridioides difficile carriage; veterinarians; veterinary healthcare workers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None to declare.

References

    1. Hensgens MPM et al. (2014) Diarrhoea in general practice: when should a Clostridium difficile infection be considered? Results of a nested case-control study. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 20, O1067–O1074. - PubMed
    1. Goorhuis A et al. (2008) Emergence of Clostridium difficile infection due to a new hypervirulent strain, polymerase chain reaction ribotype 078. Clinical Infectious Diseases 47, 1162–1170. - PubMed
    1. Weese JS (2020) Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile in animals. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 32, 213–221. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Knetsch CW et al. (2014) Whole-genome sequencing reveals potential spread of Clostridium difficile between humans and farm animals in the Netherlands, 2002 to 2011. Eurosurveillance 19, 20954. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Keessen EC et al. (2013) Clostridium difficile infection associated with pig farms. Emerging Infectious Diseases 19, 1032–1034. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types