Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2022 Mar 16;12(3):e053622.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053622.

Antenatal Doppler screening for fetuses at risk of adverse outcomes: a multicountry cohort study of the prevalence of abnormal resistance index in low-risk pregnant women

Valerie Vannevel  1   2   3 , Joshua P Vogel  4   5 , Robert C Pattinson  6   2   3 , Richard Adanu  7 , Umesh Charantimath  8 , Shivaprasad S Goudar  8 , George Gwako  9 , Avinash Kavi  8 , Ernest Maya  7 , Alfred Osoti  9 , Yeshita Pujar  8 , Zahida P Qureshi  9 , Stephen Rulisa  10 , Tanita Botha  11 , Olufemi T Oladapo  4
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Antenatal Doppler screening for fetuses at risk of adverse outcomes: a multicountry cohort study of the prevalence of abnormal resistance index in low-risk pregnant women

Valerie Vannevel et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Few interventions exist to address the high burden of stillbirths in apparently healthy pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To establish whether a trial on the impact of routine Doppler screening in a low-risk obstetric population is warranted, we determined the prevalence of abnormal fetal umbilical artery resistance indices among low-risk pregnant women using a low-cost Doppler device in five LMICs.

Methods: We conducted a multicentre, prospective cohort study in Ghana, India, Kenya, Rwanda and South Africa. Trained nurses or midwives performed a single, continuous-wave Doppler screening using the Umbiflow device for low-risk pregnant women (according to local guidelines) between 28 and 34 weeks' gestation. We assessed the prevalence of abnormal (raised) resistance index (RI), including absent end diastolic flow (AEDF), and compared pregnancy and health service utilisation outcomes between women with abnormal RI versus those with normal RI.

Results: Of 7151 women screened, 495 (6.9%) had an abnormal RI, including 14 (0.2%) with AEDF. Caesarean section (40.8% vs 28.1%), labour induction (20.5% vs 9.0%) and low birth weight (<2500 g) (15.0% vs 6.8%) were significantly more frequent among women with abnormal RI compared with women with normal RI. Abnormal RI was associated with lower birth weights across all weight centiles. Stillbirth and perinatal mortality rates were similar between women with normal and abnormal RI.

Conclusion: A single Doppler screening of low-risk pregnant women in LMICs using the Umbiflow device can detect a large number of fetuses at risk of growth restriction and consequent adverse perinatal outcomes. Many perinatal deaths could potentially be averted with appropriate intervention strategies.

Trial registration number: CTRI/2018/07/01486.

Keywords: obstetrics; primary care; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC)/University of Pretoria (UP) Maternal and Infant Healthcare Strategies Unit (VV, RCP) has previously received funding from SAMRC and the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) for Umbiflow research done by Nkosi et al. and Hlongwane et al. The CSIR provided the Umbiflow Doppler probes and Umbiflow software used in this study. As a satellite research unit, the SAMRC Maternal and Infant Healthcare Strategies Unit receives research funding from the SAMRC.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Umbiflow device (Credit: Council for Scientific and Industrial Research/South African Medical Research Council)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Recruitment flowchart. RI, resistance index.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prevalence of abnormal resistance index by gestational age.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cumulative percentage of birth weights according to centiles in neonates of women with normal and abnormal resistance index (RI).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME) . A neglected tragedy: the global burden of stillbirths. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund, 2020.
    1. Gardosi J, Madurasinghe V, Williams M, et al. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study. BMJ 2013;346:f108. 10.1136/bmj.f108 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katz J, Lee AC, Kozuki N, et al. Mortality risk in preterm and small-for-gestational-age infants in low-income and middle-income countries: a pooled country analysis. Lancet 2013;382:417–25. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60993-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McIntyre S, Blair E, Badawi N, et al. Antecedents of cerebral palsy and perinatal death in term and late preterm singletons. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:869–77. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a265ab - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bukowski R, Burgett AD, Gei A, et al. Impairment of fetal growth potential and neonatal encephalopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1011–5. 10.1067/mob.2003.233 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types