Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2022 Jul;109(1):58-68.
doi: 10.1111/ejh.13769. Epub 2022 Apr 13.

Healthcare resource utilization trends in patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy receiving first-line systemic treatment or best supportive care: A multicenter international study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Healthcare resource utilization trends in patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy receiving first-line systemic treatment or best supportive care: A multicenter international study

Tomoki Ito et al. Eur J Haematol. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: This retrospective chart review examined real-world healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in patients with AML ineligible for intensive therapy who received first-line systemic therapy or best supportive care (BSC).

Methods: Data were collected anonymously on patients with AML who initiated first-line hypomethylating agents (HMA), low-dose cytarabine (LDAC), other systemic therapy, or BSC. HRU endpoints included hospitalizations, outpatient consultations, transfusions, and supportive care.

Results: Of 1762 patients included, 46% received HMA, 11% received LDAC, 17% received other systemic therapy, 26% received BSC; median treatment durations were 118, 35, 33, and 57 days, respectively. Most patients were hospitalized, most commonly for treatment administration, transfusion, or infection (HMA 82%, LDAC 93%, other systemic therapy 83%, BSC 83%). A median number of hospitalizations were 2-6 across systemic groups and two for BSC, with median durations of 8-18 days. Transfusion rates and outpatient consultations were highest for HMA (80% and 79%) versus LDAC (57% and 53%), other systemic therapy (57% and 63%), and BSC (71% and 66%). Antivirals/antibiotics and antifungals were used more frequently than growth factors (72-92%, 34-63%, and 7-27%, respectively).

Conclusion: Patients with AML ineligible for intensive therapy have high HRU; novel therapies are needed to alleviate this burden.

Keywords: AML; best supportive care; healthcare resource utilization; hypomethylating agents; low-dose cytarabine; low-intensity therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

T. Ito: Advisory role for AbbVie and speaker honoraria for AbbVie, BMS, Novartis, Sanofi, Takeda. D. Sanford: Advisory role for AbbVie, Astellas, Novartis, Pfizer. C. Tomuleasa: No potential conflicts of interest are reported. H.‐H. Hsiao: Advisory role for AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer. L. J. Enciso Olivera: No potential conflicts of interest are reported. A. K. Enjeti: Advisory role for AbbVie, Astellas, Novartis, Alexion, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Speaker for Alexion, Bayer, Sanofi. A. Gimenez Conca: No potential conflicts of interest are reported. T. Bernal del Castillo: No potential conflicts of interest are reported. L. Girshova: No potential conflicts of interest are reported. M. P. Martelli: Advisory role for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer. Speaker honoraria for Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis. B. Guvenc: Advisory role for AbbVie. C. Bui, A. Delgado, Y. Duan, B. Garbayo Guijarro, C. Llamas: Employees of AbbVie and may hold stock or options. J.‐H. Lee: Advisory role for AbbVie, Astellas, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Changes in treatment from first‐line to fourth‐line therapy. BSC, best supportive care; HMA, hypomethylating agent; LDAC, low‐dose cytarabine; N/A, not available
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Reasons for hospitalizations during first‐line systemic therapy or BSC. Percentages may sum up to >100% as multi‐selection was permitted. AML, acute myeloid leukemia; BSC, best supportive care; HMA, hypomethylating agent; LDAC, low‐dose cytarabine

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dohner H, Weisdorf DJ, Bloomfield CD. Acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1136‐1152. - PubMed
    1. Institute NC . Cancer Stat Facts: Leukemia ‐ Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Accessed February 5, 2021. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/amyl.html
    1. Palmieri R, Paterno G, De Bellis E, et al. Therapeutic choice in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a matter of fitness. Cancers. 2020;12:120. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lai C, Doucette K, Norsworthy K. Recent drug approvals for acute myeloid leukemia. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12:100. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sasaki K, Ravandi F, Kadia TM, et al. De novo acute myeloid leukemia: a population‐ based study of outcome in the United States based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 1980 to 2017. Cancer. 2021;127:2049‐2061. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding