The role of keratinized mucosa width as a risk factor for peri-implant disease: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis
- PMID: 35298862
- PMCID: PMC9311272
- DOI: 10.1111/cid.13080
The role of keratinized mucosa width as a risk factor for peri-implant disease: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis
Abstract
Background: Studies have examined the benefit of having keratinized peri-implant mucosa width with mixed results.
Purpose: This study examines whether the lack of a prespecified (2 mm) amount of keratinized mucosa width (KMW) is a risk factor for peri-implant diseases.
Methods: A systematic electronic and manual search of randomized or nonrandomized controlled or noncontrolled clinical trials was conducted. Qualitative review, quantitative meta-analysis, and trial sequence analysis (TSA) of implants inserted at sites with <2 mm or ≥2 mm of KMW were analyzed to compare all the predetermined outcome variables. The level of evidence concerning the role of KMW in peri-implant health was evaluated via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system guide.
Results: Nine studies were included in the qualitative analysis and four in the meta-analysis and TSA. No significant inter-group difference (p > 0.05) and a low power of evidence were found for probing depth, soft-tissue recession, and marginal bone loss. A significant difference favoring ≥2 mm KMW had a lower mean plaque index (MD = 0.37, 95% CI: [0.16, 0.58], p = 0.002) (3 studies, 430 implants, low-quality evidence). GRADE system showed very low and low quality of evidence for all other outcome measures.
Conclusion: Based on the available studies, the impact of amount of KMW (either <2 mm or ≥ 2 mm) as a risk factor for developing peri-implant disease remains low. Future control studies with proper sample size and longer follow-up are needed to further validate current findings.
Keywords: alveolar bone loss; dental implants; gingival recession; meta-analysis; oral mucosa.
© 2022 The Authors. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Avila‐Ortiz G, Gonzalez‐Martin O, Couso‐Queiruga E, Wang HL. The peri‐implant phenotype. J Periodontol. 2020;91(3):283‐288. - PubMed
-
- Parpaiola A, Cecchinato D, Toia M, Bressan E, Speroni S, Lindhe J. Dimensions of the healthy gingiva and peri‐implant mucosa. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(6):657‐662. - PubMed
-
- Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. Long‐term follow‐up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5(4):347‐359. - PubMed
-
- Zigdon H, Machtei EE. The dimensions of keratinized mucosa around implants affect clinical and immunological parameters. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(4):387‐392. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
