Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun:109:103294.
doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103294. Epub 2022 Feb 25.

Understanding the opinion of doctors on obstetric violence in Brazil to improve women's care

Affiliations

Understanding the opinion of doctors on obstetric violence in Brazil to improve women's care

Taís Martins Loreto et al. Midwifery. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Disrespect and mistreatment in childbirth are human rights violations and must be understood by everyone. However, there are many controversies in the use of the term 'obstetric violence' in Brazil.

Objectives: To understand the opinion of residents and specialist doctors about obstetric violence and get a balanced view to improve women's care.

Setting: Public university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.

Participants: Residents in training and specialist doctors in obstetrics and gynecology.

Measurements: Participants answered an electronic form on obstetric violence opinions.

Findings: Of the 60 participants, 33(45%) were specialist doctors and 27(55%) were medical residents in training. Most interviewees (60%) do not agree with the use of the term "obstetric violence" to define mistreatment and disrespectful treatment of women. Regarding situations that characterize obstetric violence, the percentage of residents who agree with the following statements as forms of obstetric violence was significantly (p<0.05) higher than the specialists in the following aspects: episiotomy without consent (78% vs. 15%), episiotomy without indication (100% vs. 64%), episiotomy without anesthesia (96% vs. 76%), not allowing a companion during childbirth (89% vs. 64%), requiring silence from the birthing woman (100% vs. 73%), undergoing vaginal examinations without consent (85% vs. 58%), not allowing the woman to choose childbirth position (82% vs. 58%) and not allowing breastfeeding in the first hour (82% vs. 58%).

Conclusions and implications: The resident doctors in training are aware that the Obstetric Violence typifies the mistreatment and abuse of women during childbirth and the same is not true for specialists. Specialist doctors who completed their training longer ago should undergo training programs for a better understanding of Obstetric Violence.

Keywords: Childbirth; Human rights abuses; Obstetric violence; Obstetrician; Questionnaires; Surveys; Violence against women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest.

LinkOut - more resources