Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 13:45:101338.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101338. eCollection 2022 Mar.

Networking practices and gender inequities in academic medicine: Women's and men's perspectives

Marie Murphy  1 , Jacquelyn K Callander  1 , Daniel Dohan  2 , Jennifer R Grandis  1
Affiliations

Networking practices and gender inequities in academic medicine: Women's and men's perspectives

Marie Murphy et al. EClinicalMedicine. .

Abstract

Background: Studies of gender inequities in academic medicine suggest the negative impact of men's networking practices, but little is known about how they shape faculty experiences.

Methods: In this qualitative study, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 52 women and 52 men academic medicine faculty members at 16 institutions across the US in 2019. Interviews explored participants' experiences and perceptions of gender inequities in academic medicine, including perceptions of men's networking practices. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and transcripts were analyzed using a mixture of deductively and inductively generated codes.

Findings: Qualitative analysis of interview transcripts identified different dominant themes: (1) Women were often excluded from networking activities dominated by men, (2) Both women and men referred to men's networking practices in academic medicine, and believed they conferred benefits to members and excluded non-members from such benefits, (3) Participation in such networking activities yielded professional advantages, (4) Women made efforts to counteract their exclusion yet identified limits of those efforts.

Interpretation: The data suggests that gender inequities in academic medicine might be associated with professional interactions that occur outside of the scope of professional work practices and in formal work sites. Additional research is needed to better understand practices such as informal networking activities and their impact in order to promote gender equity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Comment in

References

    1. Jagsi R., Griffith K.A., Stewart A., Sambuco D., Decastro R., Ubel P.A. Gender differences in salary in a recent cohort of early-career physician–researchers. Acad Med. 2013;88(11):1689–1699. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sege R., Nykiel-Bub L., Selk S. Sex differences in institutional support for junior biomedical researchers. JAMA. 2015;314(11):1175. - PubMed
    1. Freund K.M., Raj A., Kaplan S.E., et al. Inequities in academic compensation by gender: a follow-up to the national faculty survey Cohort study. Acad Med. 2016;91(8):1068–1073. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gottlieb A.S., Travis E.L. Rationale and models for career advancement sponsorship in academic medicine: the time is here; the time is now. Acad Med. 2018;93(11):1620–1623. - PubMed
    1. Ma Y., Oliveira D., Woodruff T., Uzzi B. Women who win prizes get less money and prestige. Nature. 2019;565:287–288. - PubMed