The necessity of abdominal drainage for patients with complicated appendicitis undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study
- PMID: 35300711
- PMCID: PMC8928608
- DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00421-3
The necessity of abdominal drainage for patients with complicated appendicitis undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the necessity of abdominal drainage after laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with complicated appendicitis.
Methods: Patients with acute appendicitis undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy at two hospitals between January 2014 and December 2018 were retrospectively included. Complicated appendicitis was defined as the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade ≥ II. The patients were classified according to the AAST grade and the indwelling of abdominal drainage. The postoperative surgical outcomes and recovery were compared among patient groups to evaluate the impact of abdominal drainage for patients with complicated appendicitis undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy.
Results: A total of 1241 patients was retrospectively included. Among them, there were 820 patients with simple appendicitis (AAST grade I) and 421 patients with complicated appendicitis (AAST grade ≥ II). For complicated appendicitis, the drainage group (N = 192) tended to harbor more overall complications, intra-abdominal abscess formation, time to resume a soft diet, and the postoperative length of hospitalization (P = 0.0000 for all). Multivariate logistic regression confirmed that abdominal drainage increased the risk of overall complications [Odds ratio (OR) 2.439; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.597-3.726; P ≤ 0.0001] and failed to decrease the risk of intra-abdominal abscess formation (OR 1.655; 95% CI 0.487-5.616; P = 0.4193). Multivariate linear regression analysis also showed that the drainage group harbored longer postoperative length of hospitalization (Coefficients: 20.697; 95% CI 15.251-26.143; P < 0.0001) and time to resume a soft diet (Coefficients: 45.899; 95% CI 34.502-57.297; P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Abdominal drainage did not prevent overall complications in patients with complicated appendicitis; paradoxically, it delayed the convalescence. Our results discourage the routine use of abdominal drainage and suggest that abdominal drainage should be performed sparingly.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Advantages comparison of peritoneal drainage versus no drainage after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a meta-analysis.BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 16;24(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03500-8. BMC Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 39550531 Free PMC article.
-
Could an abdominal drainage be avoided in complicated acute appendicitis? Lessons learned after 1300 laparoscopic appendectomies.Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt A):40-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Oct 12. Int J Surg. 2016. PMID: 27743898
-
AbcApp: incidence of intra-abdominal ABsCesses following laparoscopic vs. open APPendectomy in complicated appendicitis.Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):1694-1699. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09670-4. Epub 2022 Oct 6. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 36203108 Free PMC article.
-
Copious Irrigation Versus Suction Alone During Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis in Adults.J Invest Surg. 2018 Aug;31(4):342-346. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1319995. Epub 2017 May 9. J Invest Surg. 2018. PMID: 28485994 Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors.Surg Endosc. 2004 Jun;18(6):969-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8262-2. Epub 2004 Apr 21. Surg Endosc. 2004. PMID: 15095081 Review.
Cited by
-
The utility of intraperitoneal drain placement after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in postoperative intraperitoneal abscess prevention.Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3571-3577. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10869-w. Epub 2024 May 15. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 38750172
-
Advantages comparison of peritoneal drainage versus no drainage after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a meta-analysis.BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 16;24(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03500-8. BMC Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 39550531 Free PMC article.
-
Prophylactic abdominal drainage following appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: A meta-analysis.Front Surg. 2023 Jan 18;9:1086877. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1086877. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2023. PMID: 36743896 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of early vs. routine removal of abdominal drainage tube after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a retrospective cohort study.Front Surg. 2025 Jul 18;12:1617312. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1617312. eCollection 2025. Front Surg. 2025. PMID: 40755481 Free PMC article.
-
Application and curative effect of laparoscopic purse-string sutures in the treatment of adult acute complicated appendicitis.BMC Surg. 2023 Jan 4;23(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01884-6. BMC Surg. 2023. PMID: 36600246 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cheng Y, Zhou S, Zhou R, Lu J, Wu S, Xiong X, Ye H, Lin Y, Wu T, Cheng N. Abdominal drainage to prevent intra-peritoneal abscess after open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2:CD010168. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical