Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May:116:106733.
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106733. Epub 2022 Mar 15.

Towards a more patient-centered clinical trial process: A systematic review of interventions incorporating health literacy best practices

Affiliations

Towards a more patient-centered clinical trial process: A systematic review of interventions incorporating health literacy best practices

Mehnaz Bader et al. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 May.

Abstract

Background: A 2019 public workshop convened by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) Roundtable on Health Literacy identified a need to develop evidence-based guidance for best practices for health literacy and patient activation in clinical trials.

Purpose: To identify studies of health literacy interventions within medical care or clinical trial settings that were associated with improved measures of health literacy or patient activation, to help inform best practices in the clinical trial process.

Data sources: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, SCOPUS, Cochrane, and Web of Science from January 2009 to June 2021.

Study selection: Of 3592 records screened, 22 records investigating 27 unique health literacy interventions in randomized controlled studies were included for qualitative synthesis.

Data extraction: Data screening and abstraction were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.

Data synthesis: Types of health literacy interventions were multimedia or technology-based (11 studies), simplification of written material (six studies) and in-person sessions (five studies). These interventions were applied at various stages in the healthcare and clinical trial process. All studies used unique outcome measures, including patient comprehension, quality of informed consent, and patient activation and engagement.

Conclusions: The findings of our study suggest that best practice guidelines recommend health literacy interventions during the clinical trial process, presentation of information in multiple forms, involvement of patients in information optimization, and improved standardization in health literacy outcome measures.

Keywords: Clinical trial process; Health literacy; Patient-centered; Qualitative synthesis; Systematic literature review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest

Mehnaz Bader: Employee of Pfizer.

Linda Zheng: No conflicts of interest to declare.

Deepika Rao: No conflicts of interest to declare.

Olayinka Shiyanbola: No conflicts of interest to declare.

Laurie Myers: Employee and stockholder of Merck & Co., Inc.

Terry Davis: No conflicts of interest to declare.

Catina O’Leary: Employee of Health Literacy Media.

Michael McKee: No conflicts of interest to declare.

Michael Wolf: Consultancy from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, LUTO UK, Sanofi, and Lundbeck; and grants/contract support from Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and Amgen.

Annlouise R. Assaf: Employee of and owns stock in Pfizer.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
PRISMA Diagram.

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Health Literacy in Healthy People 2030. (last update August 24, 2021). https://health.gov/our-work/national-health-initiatives/healthy-people/h.... Accessed November, 2021.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health. Health Literacy. https://www.nih.gov/institutes-nih/nih-office-director/office-communicat..., 2021. Accessed December, 2021.
    1. Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C, The Health Literacy of America’s Adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy: U.S Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC, 2006.
    1. Rikard RV, Thompson MS, McKinney J, Beauchamp A, Examining health literacy disparities in the United States: a third look at the National Assessment of adult literacy (NAAL), BMC Public Health 16 (2016) 975, 10.1186/s12889-016-3621-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, Health Literacy in Clinical Research: Practice and Impact: Proceedings of a Workshop, 2020, 10.17226/25616. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types