Evaluation of the treatment of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy
- PMID: 35303150
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06487-3
Evaluation of the treatment of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) combined with suction curettage in the treatment of exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).
Methods: A retrospective single-center observational study was conducted. A total of 41 patients diagnosed with exogenous CSP were enrolled in this study. All patients received HIFU combined with suction curettage.
Results: Twenty-nine patients were administered one session of HIFU ablation. In addition, the other 12 patients received 2 HIFU sessions. Suction curettage was performed in all patients after HIFU, and no patient was converted to laparoscopy or hysterectomy. The mean blood loss during suction curettage was 99 ml. Three patients received two sessions of suction curettage. The success rate of our study was 92.68%. The mean time for serum β-HCG normalization was 23.18 ± 3.13 days. The average menstruation recovery time was 29.38 ± 3.34 days. Based on the blood loss during suction curettage, 41 patients were divided into a bleeding group and a control group. The size of the gestational sac in the bleeding group (3.80 ± 0.87 cm) was larger than that in the control group (3.39 ± 0.77 cm) (P < 0.05). The thickness of the myometrium between the bladder and gestational sac in the bleeding group (2.37 ± 0.89 mm) was less than that in the control group (2.75 ± 0.75 mm) (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: The results suggested that HIFU combined with suction curettage could be considered an effective treatment for exogenous CSP of < 9 weeks. The size of the gestational sac and the thickness of the myometrium between the bladder and gestational sac might be high-risk factors for blood loss during this treatment.
Keywords: Exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy; High intensity focused ultrasound; High-risk factors; Suction curettage.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
High-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(18):e854. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000854. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015. PMID: 25950698 Free PMC article.
-
High intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy: a comparison of different HIFU sonication strategies.Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):390-396. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2044078. Int J Hyperthermia. 2022. PMID: 35196957
-
The impact of gestational sac size on the effectiveness and safety of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage treatment for caesarean scar pregnancy.Int J Hyperthermia. 2018;35(1):291-297. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1496485. Epub 2018 Sep 10. Int J Hyperthermia. 2018. PMID: 30200790
-
Efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Int J Hyperthermia. 2024;41(1):2310019. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2024.2310019. Epub 2024 Feb 8. Int J Hyperthermia. 2024. PMID: 38329796
-
Management of cesarean scar pregnancy with suction curettage: a report of four cases and review of the literature.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Jun;289(6):1171-5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3143-6. Epub 2014 Jan 25. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014. PMID: 24464347 Review.
Cited by
-
MRI-based scoring model to predict massive hemorrhage during dilatation and curettage in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Oct;48(10):3195-3206. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03968-0. Epub 2023 Jun 26. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023. PMID: 37358602 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Santos R et al (2012) The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207:44.e1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.018 - DOI
-
- Liu D, Yang M, Wu Q (2018) Application of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Clin Chim Acta 486:291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.08.012 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Xiao Z, Cheng D, Chen J, Yang J, Xu W, Xie Q (2019) The effects of methotrexate and uterine arterial embolization in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study. Medicine 98(11):e14913. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014913 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Zhu XG, Deng XL, Xiao SS, Wan YJ, Xue M (2016) A comparison of high intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolisation for the management of caesarean scar pregnancy. Int J Hyperth 32(2):144–150. https://doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2015.1104733 - DOI
-
- Wang DB, Chen YH, Zhang ZF, Chen P, Lin KR (2014) Evaluation of the transvaginal resection of low segment cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. Fertil Steril 101:602–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.024 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical