Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 18;60(6):808-820.
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-1288. Print 2022 May 25.

Interferences in immunoassays: review and practical algorithm

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Interferences in immunoassays: review and practical algorithm

Loris Wauthier et al. Clin Chem Lab Med. .
Free article

Abstract

Immunoassays are currently the methods of choice for the measurement of a large panel of complex and heterogenous molecules owing to full automation, short turnaround time, high specificity and sensitivity. Despite remarkable performances, immunoassays are prone to several types of interferences that may lead to harmful consequences for the patient (e.g., prescription of an inadequate treatment, delayed diagnosis, unnecessary invasive investigations). A systematic search is only performed for some interferences because of its impracticality in clinical laboratories as it would notably impact budget, turnaround time, and human resources. Therefore, a case-by-case approach is generally preferred when facing an aberrant result. Hereby, we review the current knowledge on immunoassay interferences and present an algorithm for interference workup in clinical laboratories, from suspecting their presence to using the appropriate tests to identify them. We propose an approach to rationalize the attitude of laboratory specialists when faced with a potential interference and emphasize the importance of their collaboration with clinicians and manufacturers to ensure future improvements.

Keywords: algorithm; immunoassay; interference; patient care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sturgeon, CM, Viljoen, A. Analytical error and interference in immunoassay: minimizing risk. Ann Clin Biochem 2011;48:418–32, https://doi.org/10.1258/acb.2011.011073.
    1. Ward, G, Simpson, A, Boscato, L, Hickman, PE. The investigation of interferences in immunoassay. Clin Biochem 2017;50:1306–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.08.015.
    1. Kricka, LJ, PJ. Immunochemical techniques. In: Rifai, N, Horvath, AR, Wittwer, C, editors. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular biology, 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2017:348–67 pp.
    1. Clerico, A, Belloni, L, Carrozza, C, Correale, M, Dittadi, R, Dotti, C, et al.. A Black Swan in clinical laboratory practice: the analytical error due to interferences in immunoassay methods. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:397–402, https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0881.
    1. Constantinescu, G, Bidlingmaier, M, Gruber, M, Peitzsch, M, Poitz, DM, van Herwaarden, AE, et al.. Mass spectrometry reveals misdiagnosis of primary aldosteronism with scheduling for adrenalectomy due to immunoassay interference. Clin Chim Acta 2020;507:98–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.04.019.

LinkOut - more resources